On 10 April 2012 13:56, Jan-Bart de Vreede <jdevreede(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Sure
"just about everything"
as in
1) Who should be on this committee
2) On what kind of requests should they form an opinion (not microgrants for example)
3) What are criteria
4) What is the process/timeline
+ 401 other things that we can come up with as questions.
But how many of those things are actually going to be difficult or
controversial? Shouldn't we at least try and answer them using our
standard approach of having an open discussion on a wiki? If it turns
out we can't answer them that way, then we can try a more elaborate
approach then.