On 2 April 2010 08:15, Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Someone on the OSM threads commented that they make an
effort to be
'whiter than white' when it comes to observing all possible legal
nuances. And it occurs to me that OSM at its heart is much more
deeply concerned with reuse and guaranteeing zero hassles for reusers
than Wikimedia currently is.
It varies. Geographical data is a particularly weak area for wikipedia.
[can you name a significant published
work that draws heavily from a Wikimedia project, other than those
produced by Wikipedians that consist entirely of an edited selection
of Wikipedia articles?]
Encyclopedia Britannica uses a lot of commons images these days.
--
geni