On 2 April 2010 08:15, Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com wrote:
Someone on the OSM threads commented that they make an effort to be 'whiter than white' when it comes to observing all possible legal nuances. And it occurs to me that OSM at its heart is much more deeply concerned with reuse and guaranteeing zero hassles for reusers than Wikimedia currently is.
It varies. Geographical data is a particularly weak area for wikipedia.
[can you name a significant published work that draws heavily from a Wikimedia project, other than those produced by Wikipedians that consist entirely of an edited selection of Wikipedia articles?]
Encyclopedia Britannica uses a lot of commons images these days.