This is a very, very old and tired argument. If you do not understand United States
non-profit corporations, go educate yourself about those first. If your perspective is
non-US based, you may have a different frame of mind which is irreconcilable with the way
WMF is. Take all the time you need to see the differences before attacking WMF for (a)
what it is and (b) why it isn't what you want it to be.
WMF exists legally, and has as its foundation organizational principle, authority vested
in a Board. WMF is not a membership organization. You would not want it to be a membership
organization (as a matter of law).
Please temper your criticism accordingly.
Brad Patrick
Former WMF General Counsel
On 10/7/20, 12:47 PM, "Wikimedia-l on behalf of Paulo Santos Perneta"
<wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of paulosperneta(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I knew they are theoretically self-appointed, but was under the impression
that at least until now an appearance of democracy and legitimacy towards
the community has been respected, which no longer seems to be the case.
I wonder what would be the legitimacy of a self-appointing body in the eyes
of the Wikimedia Movement, and all the communities which are part of it?
Regards,
Paulo
Adam Wight <adam.wight(a)wikimedia.de> escreveu no dia quarta, 7/10/2020 à(s)
17:20:
Greetings, this is a semiautomated response pointing
out that the
Wikimedia Foundation Board is not elected, it's self-appointing. The
so-called "elections" are in fact nominations to be considered by the
Board. Therefore, the Bylaws have not been broken.
This is an unfortunate arrangement, please see [1] for some background
about the conversion from a membership organization to a non-membership
organization which is no longer legally required to hold elections.
Regards,
Adam W.
[[mw:User:Adamw]]
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_membership_controversy
On 10/7/20 5:55 PM, Paulo Santos Perneta wrote:
The terms of 3 BoT members expired last month,
and the BoT itself decided
to extend them? What is the legitimacy of that? And why is a BoT which is
expected to be in a mere interim management waiting for elections,
presenting profound changes to its Bylaws [1]?
[1] -
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Octo…
Best,
Paulo
Nataliia Tymkiv <ntymkiv(a)wikimedia.org> escreveu no dia quarta,
7/10/2020
à(s) 16:49:
> Hello,
>
> I can answer a few of the questions raised in this thread.
>
> When the Board postponed the community selection of trustees, we also
> extended the terms of the trustees in the affected seats (María
Sefidari,
> Dariusz Jemielniak, and James Heilman)[1].
Their terms were originally
set
> to expire last month, but because of that
term extension they are still
> serving as trustees, and as such María remains the Board Chair and
Dariusz
> and James continue on as Committee
Chairs[2].
>
> Raju Narisetti and Esra'a Al Shafei have been reappointed to the Board
for
> an additional three-year term[3][4].
>
> The current members of the Board of Trustees are listed on the Wikimedia
> Foundation website[5].
>
> We do not currently have a shortage of trustees on the Board, and we
have
> had a quorum for every decision we have made
this year. We have
published
> some outstanding Board records, many of which
were just approved at our
> recent meeting in September[6][7].
>
> I have just sent an email to this list, as well as posted an update to
> Meta-Wiki, with a request for feedback on matters related to the
> Foundation’s Bylaws and trustee selection[8]. That announcement contains
> more information about the postponed community selection of trustees.
>
> Best regards,
>
> antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
>
> Vice Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
>
> [1]
>
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Postponement_of_Community_…
>
>
> [2]
>
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_Officers_and_Committ…
>
>
> [3]
>
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Renewing_Raju_Narisetti%27…
>
>
> [4]
>
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Renewing_Esra%27a_Al_Shafe…
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Octo…
> <
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/July…
>
> *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal
working
> hours/days, as I usually can work more as a
volunteer during weekend.
You
> should not feel obligated to answer it during
your days off. Thank you
in
> advance!*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:52 PM Bill Takatoshi <billtakatoshi(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> After I asked my questions on September 4, I was sent the message
>> below by some role account I've never heard of, asking about claims
>> that have used the names of five other people. I don't edit under my
>> real name, but I have never used the names in the linked forum
>> postings.
>>
>> The linked posts also claim that the Foundation's nonprofit status is
>> at risk. I am not a lawyer, but I am skeptical of that claim even
>> though five Trustees whose three-year terms expired in August
>> apparently voted on a Resolution in a Board meeting on September 24.
>> According to Section 4 of the Bylaws, "A quorum shall consist of a
>> majority of Trustees then in office." Section 6 says, "the Board may
>> continue doing business as a Board during the vacancy of any Trustee
>> position." Therefore, since four of the five remaining Trustees all
>> voted in favor, the Resolution was properly carried, in my layperson's
>> view. I am less certain about the propriety of allowing a Trustee
>> whose three year term expired to continue to serve as Chair.
>>
>> The lack of any update or even ETA for an update on
>>
>>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2020#Po…
>> is baffling. Elections have never been
held in person, only online,
>> and so the excuse that they were postponed because of the pandemic
>> crisis seems extremely suspicious. Indefinitely delaying elections for
>> such a vacuous reason makes the Foundation look like the worst of the
>> bad actors in today's international political climate. Doesn't the
>> cancelled travel of the pandemic crisis give the Foundation more time
>> to hold elections, not less? Whether non-profit status is at risk or
>> not, I would hope that the Foundation, Board, and Elections Committee
>> would be more interested in upholding the principles of good
>> governance than failing to even announce a new schedule or even a date
>> by which a new schedule will be announced.
>>
>> -Will
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:31 PM Gender Desk <genderscribe(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Mr. Takatoshi,
>>>
>>> Wikipediocracy has suggested that you have also used the names "Rogol
>> Domedonfors, Renée Bagslint, Jennifer Pryor-Summers, Felicity Braingut,
>> Thomas Townsend and others."
>>
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=11567
>>> Can you comment on that?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Genderdesk
>>>
>>>
genderdesk.wordpress.com
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:38 PM Samuel Klein <meta.sj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Can anyone from the elections
committee comment? What is the current
>>> plan? //S
>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:05 PM Bill Takatoshi <
billtakatoshi(a)gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How long can the Foundation legally postpone Board of Trustees
>> elections?
>>>>
>>>>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2020#Po…
>>>> has a comment from April saying,
"Once things get moving again,
>>>> appopriate [sic] date for the election will be decided and an
>>>> announcement will be made."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees#Curr…
>>>> suggests that five board members
terms end on "Wikimania 2020" -- but
>>>> is that accurate?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Term_Limit_Proposal_for_By…
>> is clear that "All Board terms are three
years" and "the term of each
>> such appointment shall not exceed three years."
>>
>> Who are the current members of the Board of Trustees?
>>
>> Can the board achieve a quorum in its present state?
>>
>> Who is the Chair currently?
>>
> --
> Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529
4266
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to:
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: