Hoi,
Given that your view is bi-polar, it is obvious who you side with.. In
reality our communities are much more of a collective. There is nothing
that gives one person the right to decide for an other and, in
reality there is no consensus among the communities. Even within one
community there is nothing whereby you can state truthfully that people all
agree.
The point is very much: the editors are not business partners. The
community does not represent them. If anything it is more anarchistic with
attributes of a collective.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 28 August 2014 12:18, ; ) <box(a)gmx.at> wrote:
Hey List,
final part of three - I think after all this gloom I do have to
propose some solutions too:
#1 EASY but hard on the ego
Only activate the pretty viewer on mobile devices per default. See
- easy. And those german wikipedians, who are "in Europe but
certainly in the global south (GerardM)" can live happily ever
after as well as those tablet driven southern rascals who are the
future. Give the chapters some clearly defined discretion
concerning feature-activation. Define the difference and rights
(!) of the community concerning tech decisions, management stuff and
content-specific decisions.
#2 HARDER but easier on the ego
Just set it active but don't hinder admins to deactivate it after
local RfCs. Get rid of the - now - poisonous superprotect.
#3 DESTRUCTIVE but great for the ego
Have fun showing those volunteers who got the power. We got the
money, we got the last say, we have superpowers! I mean - really?
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>