Dario Taraborelli, 12/10/2012 15:41:
On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:11, "Federico Leva
(Nemo)" <nemowiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
we have
some preliminary usage data coming from the FeedbackPage:
http://toolserver.org/~dartar/fp/ Graphs are empty for me there, is it just me?
We have a temporary hardware issue affecting the slave DB from which this data is pulled.
Ops is on it and I hope to have it back soon.
Thank you for enabling it again. I had read about the blind tests in
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback/Quality_assessment>
before but I see some major changes in the graphs, which are a bit hard
to understand.
1) In "Daily moderation actions (percentage)" there's a huge spike of
helpful/unhelpful after C (July), did those flags even exist before? Or
did helpfulness increase after wider usage according to the finding «the
average page receives higher quality feedback than pages picked for
their popularity/controversial topic»? (There's no change between 5 and
10 % though.)
2) "Unique daily articles with feedback moderated" shows a spike and
then a stabilization, but I don't know what the graphs actually is
about. For instance, can feedback be moderated per article ("feedback
semi/full protection" or so) or only per item, etc. Do you know if
moderation happens on the same articles and if stricter moderation
increases helpfulness of feedback also on non-moderated articles?
Nemo