lets first await how things develop, whether there are enough people being involved, if a chapter is actually the most useful format for their activities in the first place - before we are going to get into the whole political question of whether Kosovo is a seperate jurisdiction or not and what WMRS' role would be in that.
Lodewijk
2010/9/27 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
Hoi, I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set up of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine. Giving them a vote on this is not. Given that Kosovo is a separate jurisdiction means that it fulfils the basic requirement. Given that Hong Kong and New York have chapters the case for Kosovo to have a chapter is at least as strong if not stronger. Thanks, GerardM
On 27 September 2010 11:09, Nikola Smolenski smolensk@eunet.rs wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:29 +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:58, Daniel ~ Leinad <danny.leinad@gmail.com
wrote:
Look here
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_chapter_creation_guide
Plus to convince voting ChapCom members enough that it is good idea to convince WM Serbia that it is a good idea.
As a non-voting member of ChapCom and Board member of WM RS I can confirm that the harder task is to convince ChapCom.
As a non-voting board member of WM RS, I am highly doubtful of such a confirmation.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l