lets first await how things develop, whether there are enough people being
involved, if a chapter is actually the most useful format for their
activities in the first place - before we are going to get into the whole
political question of whether Kosovo is a seperate jurisdiction or not and
what WMRS' role would be in that.
Lodewijk
2010/9/27 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
Hoi,
I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set
up
of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine. Giving
them
a vote on this is not. Given that Kosovo is a separate jurisdiction means
that it fulfils the basic requirement. Given that Hong Kong and New York
have chapters the case for Kosovo to have a chapter is at least as strong
if
not stronger.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 27 September 2010 11:09, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk(a)eunet.rs> wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:29 +0200, Milos Rancic
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:58, Daniel ~ Leinad
<danny.leinad(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Look here
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_chapter_creation_guide
Plus to convince voting ChapCom members enough that it is good idea to
convince WM Serbia that it is a good idea.
As a non-voting member of ChapCom and Board member of WM RS I can
confirm that the harder task is to convince ChapCom.
As a non-voting board member of WM RS, I am highly doubtful of such a
confirmation.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l