On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:22 PM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Libelous content is one thing; but as for
"vile" -- there are a lot
of vile things and people in the world, and we need to cover them
objectively. Is it being seriously suggested the foundation intends to
remove sourced negative content depicting evil aspects fairly and
frankly when appropriate to an article?
No, I intentionally used the phrase "vile and libelous", and I mean
that as content which is both vile and libelous (although I'd also
suggest immediately removing information that is both vile and false
and presented as true, but not libelous under [[Hustler Magazine v.
Falwell]]).