2008/9/9 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>om>:
2008/9/8 Dennis During <dcduring(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Presumably the foundations and corporate funders
know how to evaluate
> us, whether it is on some statistical basis, on some good-intentions
> test, on a feel-good basis, or based on how it contributes to their
> own objectives.
Wikipedia is popular, useful and people like it lots.
It's unreliable
but has a lot of good will - when the WikiScanner hit the news, the
media and public were outraged at the organisations POV-pushing on
Wikipedia, not at us.
To clarify: "You do Wikipedia? Excellent! Are you halfway competent?
Excellent! Have some money! My name in the press release? Excellent!
Thank you!"
It's a start :-)
- d.