On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
Neo-Nazis are frequently banned for
disruptive editing as are many other aggressive POV pushers.
"All IP addresses owned or operated by the Church of Scientology and
its associates, broadly interpreted, are to be blocked as if they were
open proxies."
Is that still in effect? If so, whatever slippery slope there is, has
already been begun.
The obvious difference here being this was a ban of IP addresses owned by a particular
organization,
not the people behind it
I guess I've interpreted "its associates, broadly interpreted" too
broadly :). Seriously, how is "its associates, broadly interpreted"
supposed to be interpreted?
In any case, yes, there's a difference. But there's always a
difference between the beginning of a slippery slope and the end of
it. That's the whole point of a slippery slope.