SJ hinted at a related problem which is that we'd also need a backup organizational structure to run things operationally and legally. If the US becomes so politically unstable that hosting Wikimedia data is under threat there, just moving the data would not be enough. You'd also have to include a contingency plan that foresaw the need to legally operate the Foundation (or an equivalent organization anyway) under a different jurisdiction with corporate officers not subject to US law or extradition. If the servers are hosted in the EU but the legally controlling body and its employees are within the US, you could still see them legally forced to comply with an order, just like companies are forced to do so in other countries with censorious regimes today.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:59 AM Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com wrote:
We should have technical partners in multiple other jurisdictions that could help in a crisis, and load bearing infrastructure in at least one of them, and a plan for how and when to switch. (The walkthrough of what would be needed for a smooth transfer send most important, and useful for general reliability planning)
We should also fully support and realize Wikimedia-on-ipfs, similar to what the internet archive had been doing. (Santhosh has some excellent ideas there)
🌍🌏🌎🌑
On Wed., Sep. 30, 2020, 5:35 a.m. Dan Garry (Deskana), djgwiki@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 09:49, Erik Moeller eloquence@gmail.com wrote:
I hope that some preliminary contingency plans exist or are being developed, and I'm sure that the movement-wide debate will widen if the US continues its downward slide into authoritarianism.
I agree with Erik. Even under the Obama administration, there were
threats
to the existence of the movement, such as SOPA [1] which lead to a
blackout
[2]. One can extrapolate from current events that these threats could
well
get larger and more frequent, rather than smaller and less frequent,
should
someone in the US Government decide to focus their attention on attacking Wikipedia and free knowledge. It would be prudent to create a contingency plan which includes an exploration of other options for a location of operation for the Wikimedia Foundation and/or its servers, with their advantages and disadvantages. I personally wouldn't necessarily advocate for making the plan public; that would be ideal, but I'd be comforted merely to know it exists.
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:36, Joseph Seddon josephseddon@gmail.com wrote:
I believe options are going to be explored for sustainability but right
now
legally speaking the US is the best jurisdiction for hosting us now and
the
foreseeable future.
I agree with this too. For now, the United States remains the best place for the organisation to operate out of, and a move should not be actively considered.
Dan
[2]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA#Wikimedia_commu...
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe