Andreas, what would you do process-wise from the perspective of the WMF and/or the broader community to improve communication and its impact on development of Flow?
,Wil
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure the term "loop" is appropriate. So far, I see little evidence that feedback provided [1] is making any appreciable difference.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flow
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:12 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On 25.08.2014 06:07, Marc A. Pelletier wrote: FLOW?
Last I checked, Flow isn't deployed except as experiments in a handful of places, and is still in active deployment.
But you're correct that this would constitute a replacement rather than a new method alongside the old. A long, long overdue and desperately needed replacement -- but a replacement nonetheless.
That also explains the very deliberate development and feedback loop.
-- Marc
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe