Andreas, what would you do process-wise from the perspective of the
WMF and/or the broader community to improve communication and its
impact on development of Flow?
,Wil
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure the term "loop" is
appropriate. So far, I see little evidence
that feedback provided [1] is making any appreciable difference.
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flow
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <marc(a)uberbox.org> wrote:
On 09/05/2014 11:12 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter
wrote:
On 25.08.2014 06:07, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
FLOW?
Last I checked, Flow isn't deployed except as experiments in a handful
of places, and is still in active deployment.
But you're correct that this would constitute a replacement rather than
a new method alongside the old. A long, long overdue and desperately
needed replacement -- but a replacement nonetheless.
That also explains the very deliberate development and feedback loop.
-- Marc
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>