On Jan 7, 2008 2:03 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
When assessing risk, you need to consider not only the
cost of
something going wrong (in this case, clearly quite high), but also the
chance of it happening. How far would a policy of complying with all
but the most outrageous cease and desist notices go towards reducing
that chance? In other words, would be a good idea to not worry about
the borderline fair use cases until someone complains? What's the
chance of us ending up in court even after removing the image in
question?
"They would never sue!" is a very poor position to take.
Hammersoft