On Jan 7, 2008 2:03 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
When assessing risk, you need to consider not only the cost of something going wrong (in this case, clearly quite high), but also the chance of it happening. How far would a policy of complying with all but the most outrageous cease and desist notices go towards reducing that chance? In other words, would be a good idea to not worry about the borderline fair use cases until someone complains? What's the chance of us ending up in court even after removing the image in question?
"They would never sue!" is a very poor position to take.
Hammersoft