I quite agree that Phabricator is not suitable for these discussions.
Perhaps Tim would like to say where and how discussions between the
Community and Foundation staff about the need for, and desirability of,
projects like this should be held. After all, we all want projects to go
ahead on the basis of Community input, don't we?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Tim Starling <tstarling(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
On 13/06/17 20:28, Gergő Tisza wrote:
Now that we have ascertained (again) that
wikimedia-l is a poor channel
for focused discussions about tech proposals, can we move this to
Phabricator?
I filed
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T168218
On 14/06/17 12:12, Risker wrote:
I see your point, Gergo, but in reality
Phabricator is an even worse
channel to discuss projects that are, essentially, social issues.
I'd rather you didn't discuss social issues on Phabricator. I filed
the task for the technical part of the project.
-- Tim Starling
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/
wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>