On 22 September 2011 12:19, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So is there a simpler way to do this, is there some
flaw in this that would
prevent it working, or is this the flying unicorn option?
I believe it was envisioned as working for anonymous casual readers as well.
There *should* be some way to at least have the no-images option for
anonymous readers without ruining caching ...
- d.