Hoi,
If you want statistics, you do not have to google ... there are our own
statistics ...
http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/_PowerPosters.html I am a power
poster and that often does not feel good. However, it is beside the point.
I am on a conference and it is from people who are essential to this
conference that I have this information. Now if you think that you need to
pass judgement on this, you have a self centred world. That is very much
part of the issue. The issue is that the context of the issue IS clear from
my original post. I will not damage these people by naming them.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/11/8 <WJhonson(a)aol.com>
In a message dated 11/7/2009 11:28:13 PM Pacific
Standard Time,
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com writes:
Please read it as an appeal to reply to
foundation-l in moderation.
Please
read it as an appeal to post liberally to this list as we do not have an
alternative.>>
-------------------
Speaking of self-moderation., a google search on
Foundation-l "gerard meijssen" shows
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&
rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=7zN&num=50&q=foundation-l+%22gerard+Meijssen%22&lr=&
aq=f&oq=&aqi=<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&am…
33,000 pages
Is there a way to create a chart showing how many messages each poster has
posted to the list? Also Gerard I think if you're going to use an argument
about the value of those people who *aren't* posting, we need to know who
they are. Perhaps we don't want them to post either.
Until we get some hard facts on the issue, how is any decision supposed to
be able to be reached?
W.J.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l