geni wrote:
2008/9/3 Crazy Lover
<always_yours.forever(a)yahoo.com>om>:
you don't understand anything. the nab is the
policy. if a language is "dead" (no longer >native speakers) don't meet
the wikimedia language proposal policy. Applying the rules, any >latin projects must be
reject. It is not admisible that langcom don't apply with equality the >rule.
Like all rules it breaks down under extreme conditions. Latin is a
very extreme case. Trying to compare ancient greek to it is insulting
to the intelligence of this mailing list.
And trying to say that they are uncomparable is insulting to my
intelligence at least.
Latin and Ancient Greek are, you admit, used in the same way, and the
only difference is the number of speakers. The number of speakers isn't
relevant for live languages, so why would it be relevant for dead ones?