Hi,
this year in a Gsoc project, following a proposal by the student, we are
using a dedicated mailing list for his project. I think it is a great
solution because:
- interested people can follow the project without bothering usual mailing
lists
- the evolution of the project is recorded and public for future reference
- offers more flexibility than plain email, because each participant can
decide how many messages to get
OTOH, by using a Googlegroup we are outside of the typical development
channels, creating an artificial island. I was wondering if Phabricator
offer a solution for this? Or is there a way to connect a mailing list to a
bug report? I'm thinking of ad-hoc mailing lists like documents in etherpad.
Micru
Hi,
EFF has published this transparency report called "Who has your back" which
now includes Wikimedia (I think they are referring to the Wikimedia
Foundation, though).
Well, the result is slightly disappointing:
https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014#wikimed…
About "fighting for users privacy in court", I think this is something we
do, isn't it? Doesn't the case with the editor Diu in Greece apply?
WMF also seem to lack the publication of a transparency report.
Cristian
(among other things, EFF supporter)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: EFFector List <editor(a)eff.org>
Date: 2014-05-16 8:43 GMT+02:00
Subject: New "Who Has Your Back" report shows Internet companies competing
on privacy
To: Cristian Consonni <kikkocristian(a)gmail.com>
View as a web page<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=650>
[image: EFFector!]<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=650>
[image:
Electronic Frontier Foundation] <https://www.eff.org/>
In our 661st issue:
- UPDATES <#14603c5c779f5b63_Updates>
- MINILINKS <#14603c5c779f5b63_minilinks>
- ANNOUNCEMENTS <#14603c5c779f5b63_announcements>
When the Government Comes Knocking, Who Has Your
Back?<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014>
When governments are after your personal data, which online services will
stand up and defend it? In our fourth annual *Who Has Your Back* report, we
look at companies' public policies and practices, so that privacy-conscious
consumers can make an informed decision about who to trust with their most
sensitive data. We were pleased to find out that, in a year rocked by
high-profile disclosures of NSA spying reaching into our online accounts,
many companies have responded by increasing their commitment to
transparency, pushing back against mass surveillance, and fighting for
their users. The full
report<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014>goes
into extensive detail about how each company performed, and what
exactly our evaluation criteria were. Public policies and commitments
aren't the last word when it comes to defending your privacy, but as we
trust online services with more and more of our information, it's an
increasingly important component. If you're concerned about your privacy
from overreaching surveillance, you'll want to know: when the government
comes knocking, who has your
back<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014>
?
It's Time to Defend Net Neutrality: Tell the FCC What you Think of its
Proposed Regulations <https://dearfcc.org/>
Today the FCC met to discuss new rules that could determine the future of
network neutrality. There’s been a lot of news
circulating<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/fccs-new-rules-could-threaten-net-neu…>about
what the FCC's plan will contain. And while we haven't seen the text
of the plan yet, we know the agency is still considering a set of rules
that will allow Internet providers to differentiate how we access websites.
But the FCC is clearly hearing the public outcry to protect the future of
the Internet. The agency announced that they are seeking comment on wider
set of initiatives that would stop ISPs from setting up pay-to-play
Internet fast lanes. The FCC is opening a four-month comment window to hear
from people across country about how their proposed rules will effect the
future of our Internet. So we must take this opportunity to speak up —
early, and often. EFF has created a tool to help. Visit
DearFCC.org<https://dearfcc.org/>to raise your voice and make sure the
FCC is clear on this point: We don't
want regulations that will turn ISPs into gatekeepers to their subscribers.
EFF Updates
Victory! Chevron Withdraws Subpoenas to Anonymous Email Users Represented
by EFF and EarthRights
International<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/long-fought-victory-anonymous-email-u…>
EFF and EarthRights International represented Ecuadorian environmental
activists, attorneys, and journalists fighting against the environmental
damage caused by Chevron in Ecuador. After several court battles, Chevron
agreed to withdraw subpoenas to Yahoo! and Google requesting extensive and
troubling information about webmail users.
The Morality Police in Your Checking Account: Chase Bank Shuts Down
Accounts of Adult
Entertainers<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/moral-police-your-checking-account-ch…>
Chase Bank sent letters to hundreds of adult entertainers informing them
that their bank accounts would be shut down without giving a reason. Some
are speculating that the Department of Justice's misguided "Operation
Chokepoint" program may be behind the move.
International Day Against DRM: It's Time to Fix U.S. Copyright
Law<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/understanding-digital-rights-manageme…>
Digital rights management (DRM) is technology that purportedly exists to
protect against copyright infringement, but in practice limits how people
use and share technology they have paid for.
We’ve Got TPP Right Where We Want It: Going
Nowhere<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/tpp-right-where-we-want-it-going-nowh…>
The secrecy surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade
agreement, and the massive opposition TPP has faced from all sides, appears
to be stalling the negotiation process.
The White House Big Data Report: The Good, The Bad, and The
Missing<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/white-house-big-data-report-good-bad-…>
We did an in-depth analysis of a big data report commissioned by President
Obama. While the report addresses issues like the dangers of discrimination
based on big data, it ignores others, and even has some concerning
suggestions, such as likening whistleblowers to violent criminals.
EFF Calls for Release of Ethiopian Dissident
Bloggers<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/eff-calls-release-ethiopian-dissident…>
Bloggers in Ethiopia who are critical of the government face censorship,
intimidation, and pervasive surveillance. Recently, six dissident bloggers
were arrested--the government of Ethiopia must release them now.
Government Plays Fast and Loose with Technology in Supreme Court Cell Phone
Cases<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/government-plays-fast-and-loose-techn…>
The government's arguments in two Supreme Court cases regarding cell phone
searches by law enforcement included extreme mischaracterizations both of
how cell phone technology works and how people use it.
Pols to Ad Networks: Pretend We Passed SOPA, and Never Mind About Violating
Antitrust Law<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/pols-ad-networks-pretend-we-passed-so…>
Members of Congress are pressuring ad networks to blacklist sites based on
easy to abuse commercial definitions of "pirate sites." This mimics the
Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) even though public pressure ensured that SOPA
did not become law, and it may very well violate federal antitrust law.
EFF Releases Alpha Version of Privacy Badger, a New Tool to Help Block
Trackers and Spy Ads <https://www.eff.org/privacybadger>
EFF has released our first version of Privacy Badger, a new open source
browser add-on for Firefox and Chrome that stops advertisers and other
third-party trackers from secretly tracking where you go and what pages you
look at on the web.
miniLinks
The battle against pervasive surveillance can be won –
really!<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/10/the-battle-to-retake-o…>
Between legislative action like USA FREEDOM, direct action like Reset the
Net, and legal action like EFF's NSA cases, we will see real change to the
NSA.
Why I Licensed Under Creative Commons: I’m Building the World I Want to
Live In<http://www.slhuang.com/blog/2014/04/27/why-i-licensed-under-creative-common…>
Novelist SL Huang explains how using Creative Commons licenses helps
creativity thrive.
Cops Must Swear Silence to Access Vehicle Tracking
System<http://www.wired.com/2014/05/license-plate-tracking/>
Cops who use a private vehicle tracking database can't cooperate with the
media, according to its user agreement.
Supported by Members
Our members make it possible for EFF to bring legal and technological
expertise into crucial battles about online rights. Whether defending free
speech online or challenging unconstitutional surveillance, your
participation makes a difference. Every donation gives technology users who
value freedom online a stronger voice and more formidable advocate.
Please consider becoming an EFF member today.
Donate Today <https://supporters.eff.org/join/effector>
Administrivia
Editor: Nadia Kayyali, Activist
*editor(a)eff.org* <editor(a)eff.org>
EFFector is a publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
*eff.org* <https://www.eff.org/>
Membership & donation queries: *membership(a)eff.org* <membership(a)eff.org>
General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:
*info(a)eff.org*<info(a)eff.org>
*Reproduction* of this publication in electronic media is *encouraged*.
MiniLinks do not necessarily represent the views of EFF.
*Back issues of EFFector* <https://www.eff.org/effector/>
*Change your email address * <https://www.eff.org/profileupdate>
This newsletter is printed from 100% recycled electrons.
EFF appreciates your support and respects your privacy. *Privacy
Policy*<http://www.eff.org/policy>.
*Unsubscribe or change your email
preferences*<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/profile/edit?reset=1&gid=14&id=1721910&c…>,
or *opt out of all EFF
email*<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=5018&qid=2748…>
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109-7701
United States
[image: Join EFF!] <https://supporters.eff.org/join/effector> Members
make it possible for EFF to fight for your rights. Become a member today.
Announcements
EFF at the Los Angeles Chapter Information Systems Security Association
Summit <https://www.eff.org/event/eff-issa-la-information-security-summit>
EFF Staff Attorney Nate Cardozo will join a panel of experts for a
discussion entitled Privacy and Security in the Age of NSA and Snowden
exploring corporate data collection and government spying.
Don't forget to stop by the EFF table!
DISCOUNT FOR EFF SUPPORTERS: Receive a 25% discount on
registration<http://summit.issala.org/register>when you use the promo
code EFF_Summit_25.
*May 16, 2014 Los Angeles, CA*
EFF at Bitcoin 2014 <https://www.eff.org/event/bitcoin-2014>
EFF Activism Director Rainey Reitman and EFF Special Counsel Marcia Hofmann
will give a talk on "Bitcoin as a Liberty-Enhancing Technology: Case
Studies in Financial Censorship and the SOPA Saga" on Saturday May 17th.
After their presentation, they will participate in a panel discussion about
Bitcoin and government relations.
* May 17, 2014 Amsterdam, Netherlands*
EFF at Bay Area Maker
Faire<https://www.eff.org/event/eff-bay-area-maker-faire-2014>
Join EFF at Maker Faire Bay Area! We are proud to support the rights of
modern innovators and promote the spirit of DIY creativity and freedom.
Stop by the EFF Maker Faire booth to learn more and become an official EFF
member.
*May 18-19, 2014 San Francisco, CA *
Techno-Activism Third Mondays
(TA3)<https://www.eff.org/event/techno-activism-third-mondays-ta3m-1>
Techno-Activism Third Mondays (TA3M) are informal meetups that occur on the
same date in many cities worldwide. It is designed to connect
techno-activists and hacktivists who work on or with circumvention tools,
and/or are interested in anti-censorship and anti-surveillance technology.
TA3M are held in New York, Washington, DC, Amsterdam, Portland, Tokyo, and
more.
* May 19, 2014 EFF Offices 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco*
Personal Democracy Forum
(PDF)<https://www.eff.org/event/personal-democracy-forum-pdf>
EFF's Rainey Reitman and Jillian York will speak at the Personal Democracy
Forum. PDF brings together a thousand top opinion makers, political
practitioners, technologists, and journalists from across the ideological
spectrum for two days to network, exchange ideas, and explore how
technology and wired citizens are changing politics, governance, and civil
society.
*June 5-6, 2014 New York, NY*
How NSA Spying Can Affect Your Legal Case and What Steps You Can Take to
Protect Your Client<https://www.eff.org/event/what-you-dont-know-can-hurt-you-how-nsa-spying-ca…>
EFF Staff Attorney Hanni Fakhoury will give a one hour CLE presentation for
the Bar Association of San Francisco, discussing how NSA and other
intelligence communities gather and tip information to law enforcement
agencies in routine criminal cases. He will also explain steps criminal
defense attorneys can take to figure out if NSA derived evidence is being
used against their clients.
*June 19, 2014 Bar Association of San Francisco 301 Battery St, San
Francisco, CA *
EFF on [image: twitter] <http://twitter.com/eff> [image:
facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/eff> [image:
google plus] <https://plus.google.com/+eff> [image:
identica]<https://identi.ca/eff>
Hi, I spent a few minutes searching on Meta for how "impact" is defined. What is the WMF definition?
Some examples of places where "impact" is used:
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_portal/Impact_report_form
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Impact_report_form_Q%26A
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Learning/Round_1_2013/Impact
* https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/05/02/beginning-understand-what-works-measu…
* https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Program_evaluation_basics:_efficiency,_effe…
I am not fond of the Boulmetis / Dutwin definition used in that last reference because short-term effects can be important and much easier to measure than long-term effects. For example, an administrator protecting a page can have the short-term effect of preventing editing and preventing an edit war, and the long term effects of that can be impossible to know, such as whether preventing an edit war prevented the situation from escalating to an Arbcom case with imposition of long-term blocks, and also whether preventing editing prevented important information from being added to the page by an occasional IP editor.
I might suggest a rewrite of that entire page on "program evaluation basics" to make it simple. Right now it's a wall of text that's difficult to follow and, I feel, at least partly wrong. I think that Edward Galvez is working on some of these issues and I would be happy to have him or someone else in Evaluation thoughtfully redesign and rewrite that page to make it easy to follow for everyone including non-native English speakers. If I have a hard time with that page, you can imagine how difficult it is for someone who only understands English at an intermediate level. I would like to start with having a clear and simple definition of "impact" that makes sense in Wikimedia contexts, and some examples that are easy to follow.
Thanks,
Pine
Dear all,
Pavel Richter has been Wikimedia Deutschland’s Executive Director since
2009. Over the course of the past five years he has established an
organizational structure that serves as a solid basis for Wikimedia
Deutschland’s free knowledge mission.
For quite some time the Supervisory Board has been striving for a different
strategic course for Wikimedia Deutschland, which will be illustrated by
the strategy paper to be introduced at the coming general assembly. The
Supervisory Board has come to the conclusion that it will not be able to
implement this paper with the current Executive Director. Thus, the
Supervisory Board and the Executive Director have agreed on jointly shaping
a well-ordered transition.
The association and Pavel Richter have agreed on a mutual separation to
take place. There will be talks regarding the modalities of an amicable
arrangement. On behalf of the Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland I
would like to thank Pavel for his very good work and for both the
professionalism and passion with which he has shaped the development of
Wikimedia Deutschland.
Nikolas Becker for the Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland
Wikimedia Deutschland e. V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23/24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B.
Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin,
Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
Wikimedia Nederland published it April report :
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Nederl…
It is included in this message as plain text.
==== COMMUNITY: supporting and mobilising volunteers and editors====
* Small grants programme
WMNL gave a grant of € 200 for the organisation of a writing event on women
and art.
* Wiki-Saturdays
Two Wiki-Saturdays, with 4 resp. 6 participants, were held in April.
==== WORK: content, collaboration and activity development====
* Wiki Loves Earth.
A group of volunteers, supported by office staff, worked hard to prepare
for the launch of Wiki Loves Earth on May 1. They have a developed a full
programme of events in cooperation with the Netherlands' National Parks,
focussing on uploading images and sounds.
* Museum Naturalis cooperation
WMNL will continue to work on the theme of nature, biodiversity and
landscape after the international Wiki Loves Earth competition has
finished. We met with representatives of Naturalis, the Museum of Natural
History, to discuss cooperation. Already we have planned a editing event
for October 4/5, but we are also discussing content donations. We want to
link these activities to a concerted action to recruit new editors from
(volunteer) organisations working on natural history.
* Education Programme
The consultants engaged to carry out a feasibility study for cooperation
between WMNL and the education sector have started work. In April and May
they will carry out interviews with representatives of institutes of higher
education and with members of the international Wikimedia community. Their
interim results will be presented to and discussed with the community on
May 24.
* GLAMwiki Toolset (mass-upload tool)
The Amsterdam Museum hosted a GLAMwiki Toolset workshop on the 4th of
April. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Museum, University Museum Utrecht, National
Archives of the Netherlands, National Library of the
Netherlands,Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision, Wikipedians in
Residence and volunteers participated in this workshop. Every step from
choosing suitable content to uploading it was covered during the workshop.
The lessons learned are being collected in the |GLAMwiki Toolset Manual.
* Wiki Loves Bieb
First preparations were made for the monthly Wikipedia courses that will be
hosted by the library in Amersfoort, starting on June the 13th.
* Wikipedians in Residence
The Wikipedians in Residence had a meeting at the WMNL office on the 28th
of April. Two workshops were organized for employees of Sound and Vision in
which they were encouraged to consider the platforms of Wikimedia when
setting up new projects.
* Wikidata Workshop
The Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision hosted a Wikidata workshop
given bij Gerard Meijssen on April 11th. The workshop was focussed on
explaining what Wikidata is, to show how single and batch edits can be done
and to discuss the different possibilities for GLAMs to use Wikidata. Apart
from a variety of participants from the institute itself also the
Rijksmuseum and Wikipedians in Residence were present. More workshops will
be organised in 2014.
* World War II - warmonuments
April was war monuments month for WMNL. In cooperation with the Nationaal
Comité 4 en 5 may, we asked members of the public to make and upload
photos of warmonuments. More than 2,000 images were uploaded via the
campaign template. WMNL will continue to focus on improving and adding to
content concerning World War II. We are exploring cooperation with NIOD,
the National institute for war, genocide and holocaust studies. More news
in the next report.
====WMNL====
* Newsletter
: An |issue of the newsletter was sent out.
====FUNDING====
* WMNL received a generous donation of €12,500 from a private donor.
====GLOBAL====
* Wikimedia Conference Berlin
Chair Frans Grijzenhout, Board Member International Affairs Ad Huikeskoven
en Executive Director Sandra Rientjes attended the Wikimedia Conference in
Berlin. .
* Program evaluation and design workshop, Berlin
Sebastiaan ter Burg attended the Program Evaluation and Design workshop in
Berlin to learn how to improve the "program manual" that WMNL already has
developed.
* Wiki Loves Monuments International.
The final report on Wiki Loves Monuments International was submitted to the
WMF. WMNL acted as fiscal sponsor to the project team, taking care of
payments and accounting.
====GOVERNANCE====
* Board retreat
The newly elected Board met for two days to discuss division of tasks and
get acquainted.
* New staff member
Jolanda Adelaar joined the WMNL office team to work on finances and office
management. She replaces Tom Kisters who left on May 1st to finalise his
studies with an internship at an international accountancy firm.
* Q1 report submitted
We submitted our |report on activities in the first quarter to WMF.
====Upcoming====
* May 24: Education Programme -presentation and discussion at the Wikimedia
office in Utrecht
* May 24 Maps and Wikipedia meeting, Amsterdam
* May 25: Wiki Loves Earth eventsin three National Parks
Sandra Rientjes
Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland
tel. (+31) (0)30 3200238
mob. (+31) (0)6 31786379
www.wikimedia.nl
*Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:*
Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3
3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht
_______________________________________________
Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
_______________________________________________
WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
Hoi,
Amir Ladsgroup has developed reports that show differences between the date
of birth and the date of death as known in the English Wikipedia and
Wikidata.
Such differences may be wrong in either Wikidata or Wikipedia. They are the
ones that need attention, they are the ones where sources makes a real
difference.
At this stage Amir is finalising the code. Given that this software can run
repeatedly, the results will change when the software l earns about changes
in either Wikidata or Wikipedia.
One practical question is where should these reports be located. It can be
in both Wikipedia and Wikidata. It is likely that many similar reports
reporting on different statements will become available.
Thanks,
GerardM
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report/Conflict_wit…https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Death_date_report/Conflict_wit…http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/05/wikipedia-vs-wikidata-qualitativ…
Hi Keegan,
I looked for equivalent Meta policies before posting the links to English Wikipedia.
Canvassing is referenced on Meta and Commons although there is no page on Meta or Commons specifically describing a canvassing policy that I see. Perhaps there should be, since both wikis seem to have an unwritten rule against canvassing.
I believe I was clear that the RfC guidelines and the Drama essay are from English Wikipedia but I think they are the best practice to follow here, and that this is my opinion only.
I agree that posting a notification to this list was appropriate, but not with forking or moving the discussion to here.
Pine
Greetings!
With apologies for any cross-posting, we are contacting you all now as we
are reaching out to the Wikimedia community and all program leaders,
evaluators, volunteers, and others who hold a stake and/or interest in
Wikimedia program evaluation and design.
We present this request for comment (RfC) and a new community discussion
page on the evaluation portal:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Parlor/Dialogue
Let's Talk! Program Evaluation and Metrics
As we come upon one year’s time since our Program Evaluation and Design
team began on the initiative to build program evaluation capacity, we’d
like to hear from the community of Wikimedia -- program leaders,
evaluators, volunteers, and other stakeholders in program evaluation and
design -- about your perspectives on those efforts.
Background: The focus of the evaluation capacity building initiative is
peer learning, practice sharing, and the adoption of shared language and
approach to program evaluation across the movement. This initiative is to
support the discoverability and innovation of programs that will achieve
high impact. Importantly, the team is charged with developing learning
resources and tools to support program leaders to self-evaluate their
program efforts and impacts.
Current RfC: Please visit the dialogue pages to share your perspective on:
* How we should evaluate and report on the program evaluation and design
capacity-building initiative.
* The evaluation learning opportunities and resources made available.
* Program metrics piloted in the beta reports.
* How we should assess grantmaking to groups and individuals.
Visit
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Parlor/Dialogue
for all the details and to participate.
Please be encouraged to also forward this announcement to any lists or
individuals you think might be interested.
On behalf of the Program Evaluation and Design team, thank you for your
time and attention, we hope to hear from you in our portal.
Best regards,
Jaime
--
Jaime Anstee, Ph.D
Program Evaluation Specialist
Wikimedia Foundation
+1.415.839.6885 ext 6869
www.wikimediafoundation.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
*https://donate.wikimedia.org <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>*
Hey everyone :)
I'll be doing another Wikidata office hour on IRC. It will take place
on May 19th at 5PM UTC in #wikimedia-office. For your timezone please
see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Wikidata+office+ho…
I'll be giving a status update and then answer whatever
Wikidata-related questions you have. Hope to see many of you there.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin
www.wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.