Wikimedia-l May 2014

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

181 participants
144 discussions

Task-oriented mailing lists
by David Cuenca 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hi, this year in a Gsoc project, following a proposal by the student, we are using a dedicated mailing list for his project. I think it is a great solution because: - interested people can follow the project without bothering usual mailing lists - the evolution of the project is recorded and public for future reference - offers more flexibility than plain email, because each participant can decide how many messages to get OTOH, by using a Googlegroup we are outside of the typical development channels, creating an artificial island. I was wondering if Phabricator offer a solution for this? Or is there a way to connect a mailing list to a bug report? I'm thinking of ad-hoc mailing lists like documents in etherpad. Micru

3 2

Wikimedia in "Who has your back" EFF transparency report.
by Cristian Consonni 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hi, EFF has published this transparency report called "Who has your back" which now includes Wikimedia (I think they are referring to the Wikimedia Foundation, though). Well, the result is slightly disappointing: https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014#wikimed… About "fighting for users privacy in court", I think this is something we do, isn't it? Doesn't the case with the editor Diu in Greece apply? WMF also seem to lack the publication of a transparency report. Cristian (among other things, EFF supporter) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: EFFector List <editor(a)eff.org> Date: 2014-05-16 8:43 GMT+02:00 Subject: New "Who Has Your Back" report shows Internet companies competing on privacy To: Cristian Consonni <kikkocristian(a)gmail.com> View as a web page<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=650> [image: EFFector!]<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/view?reset=1&id=650> [image: Electronic Frontier Foundation] <https://www.eff.org/> In our 661st issue: - UPDATES <#14603c5c779f5b63_Updates> - MINILINKS <#14603c5c779f5b63_minilinks> - ANNOUNCEMENTS <#14603c5c779f5b63_announcements> When the Government Comes Knocking, Who Has Your Back?<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014> When governments are after your personal data, which online services will stand up and defend it? In our fourth annual *Who Has Your Back* report, we look at companies' public policies and practices, so that privacy-conscious consumers can make an informed decision about who to trust with their most sensitive data. We were pleased to find out that, in a year rocked by high-profile disclosures of NSA spying reaching into our online accounts, many companies have responded by increasing their commitment to transparency, pushing back against mass surveillance, and fighting for their users. The full report<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014>goes into extensive detail about how each company performed, and what exactly our evaluation criteria were. Public policies and commitments aren't the last word when it comes to defending your privacy, but as we trust online services with more and more of our information, it's an increasingly important component. If you're concerned about your privacy from overreaching surveillance, you'll want to know: when the government comes knocking, who has your back<https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-government-data-requests-2014> ? It's Time to Defend Net Neutrality: Tell the FCC What you Think of its Proposed Regulations <https://dearfcc.org/> Today the FCC met to discuss new rules that could determine the future of network neutrality. There’s been a lot of news circulating<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/fccs-new-rules-could-threaten-net-neu…>about what the FCC's plan will contain. And while we haven't seen the text of the plan yet, we know the agency is still considering a set of rules that will allow Internet providers to differentiate how we access websites. But the FCC is clearly hearing the public outcry to protect the future of the Internet. The agency announced that they are seeking comment on wider set of initiatives that would stop ISPs from setting up pay-to-play Internet fast lanes. The FCC is opening a four-month comment window to hear from people across country about how their proposed rules will effect the future of our Internet. So we must take this opportunity to speak up — early, and often. EFF has created a tool to help. Visit DearFCC.org<https://dearfcc.org/>to raise your voice and make sure the FCC is clear on this point: We don't want regulations that will turn ISPs into gatekeepers to their subscribers. EFF Updates Victory! Chevron Withdraws Subpoenas to Anonymous Email Users Represented by EFF and EarthRights International<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/long-fought-victory-anonymous-email-u…> EFF and EarthRights International represented Ecuadorian environmental activists, attorneys, and journalists fighting against the environmental damage caused by Chevron in Ecuador. After several court battles, Chevron agreed to withdraw subpoenas to Yahoo! and Google requesting extensive and troubling information about webmail users. The Morality Police in Your Checking Account: Chase Bank Shuts Down Accounts of Adult Entertainers<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/moral-police-your-checking-account-ch…> Chase Bank sent letters to hundreds of adult entertainers informing them that their bank accounts would be shut down without giving a reason. Some are speculating that the Department of Justice's misguided "Operation Chokepoint" program may be behind the move. International Day Against DRM: It's Time to Fix U.S. Copyright Law<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/understanding-digital-rights-manageme…> Digital rights management (DRM) is technology that purportedly exists to protect against copyright infringement, but in practice limits how people use and share technology they have paid for. We’ve Got TPP Right Where We Want It: Going Nowhere<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/tpp-right-where-we-want-it-going-nowh…> The secrecy surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement, and the massive opposition TPP has faced from all sides, appears to be stalling the negotiation process. The White House Big Data Report: The Good, The Bad, and The Missing<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/white-house-big-data-report-good-bad-…> We did an in-depth analysis of a big data report commissioned by President Obama. While the report addresses issues like the dangers of discrimination based on big data, it ignores others, and even has some concerning suggestions, such as likening whistleblowers to violent criminals. EFF Calls for Release of Ethiopian Dissident Bloggers<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/eff-calls-release-ethiopian-dissident…> Bloggers in Ethiopia who are critical of the government face censorship, intimidation, and pervasive surveillance. Recently, six dissident bloggers were arrested--the government of Ethiopia must release them now. Government Plays Fast and Loose with Technology in Supreme Court Cell Phone Cases<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/government-plays-fast-and-loose-techn…> The government's arguments in two Supreme Court cases regarding cell phone searches by law enforcement included extreme mischaracterizations both of how cell phone technology works and how people use it. Pols to Ad Networks: Pretend We Passed SOPA, and Never Mind About Violating Antitrust Law<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/pols-ad-networks-pretend-we-passed-so…> Members of Congress are pressuring ad networks to blacklist sites based on easy to abuse commercial definitions of "pirate sites." This mimics the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) even though public pressure ensured that SOPA did not become law, and it may very well violate federal antitrust law. EFF Releases Alpha Version of Privacy Badger, a New Tool to Help Block Trackers and Spy Ads <https://www.eff.org/privacybadger> EFF has released our first version of Privacy Badger, a new open source browser add-on for Firefox and Chrome that stops advertisers and other third-party trackers from secretly tracking where you go and what pages you look at on the web. miniLinks The battle against pervasive surveillance can be won – really!<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/10/the-battle-to-retake-o…> Between legislative action like USA FREEDOM, direct action like Reset the Net, and legal action like EFF's NSA cases, we will see real change to the NSA. Why I Licensed Under Creative Commons: I’m Building the World I Want to Live In<http://www.slhuang.com/blog/2014/04/27/why-i-licensed-under-creative-common…> Novelist SL Huang explains how using Creative Commons licenses helps creativity thrive. Cops Must Swear Silence to Access Vehicle Tracking System<http://www.wired.com/2014/05/license-plate-tracking/> Cops who use a private vehicle tracking database can't cooperate with the media, according to its user agreement. Supported by Members Our members make it possible for EFF to bring legal and technological expertise into crucial battles about online rights. Whether defending free speech online or challenging unconstitutional surveillance, your participation makes a difference. Every donation gives technology users who value freedom online a stronger voice and more formidable advocate. Please consider becoming an EFF member today. Donate Today <https://supporters.eff.org/join/effector> Administrivia Editor: Nadia Kayyali, Activist *editor(a)eff.org* <editor(a)eff.org> EFFector is a publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. *eff.org* <https://www.eff.org/> Membership & donation queries: *membership(a)eff.org* <membership(a)eff.org> General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries: *info(a)eff.org*<info(a)eff.org> *Reproduction* of this publication in electronic media is *encouraged*. MiniLinks do not necessarily represent the views of EFF. *Back issues of EFFector* <https://www.eff.org/effector/> *Change your email address * <https://www.eff.org/profileupdate> This newsletter is printed from 100% recycled electrons. EFF appreciates your support and respects your privacy. *Privacy Policy*<http://www.eff.org/policy>. *Unsubscribe or change your email preferences*<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/profile/edit?reset=1&gid=14&id=1721910&c…>, or *opt out of all EFF email*<https://supporters.eff.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=5018&qid=2748…> 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109-7701 United States [image: Join EFF!] <https://supporters.eff.org/join/effector> Members make it possible for EFF to fight for your rights. Become a member today. Announcements EFF at the Los Angeles Chapter Information Systems Security Association Summit <https://www.eff.org/event/eff-issa-la-information-security-summit> EFF Staff Attorney Nate Cardozo will join a panel of experts for a discussion entitled Privacy and Security in the Age of NSA and Snowden exploring corporate data collection and government spying. Don't forget to stop by the EFF table! DISCOUNT FOR EFF SUPPORTERS: Receive a 25% discount on registration<http://summit.issala.org/register>when you use the promo code EFF_Summit_25. *May 16, 2014 Los Angeles, CA* EFF at Bitcoin 2014 <https://www.eff.org/event/bitcoin-2014> EFF Activism Director Rainey Reitman and EFF Special Counsel Marcia Hofmann will give a talk on "Bitcoin as a Liberty-Enhancing Technology: Case Studies in Financial Censorship and the SOPA Saga" on Saturday May 17th. After their presentation, they will participate in a panel discussion about Bitcoin and government relations. * May 17, 2014 Amsterdam, Netherlands* EFF at Bay Area Maker Faire<https://www.eff.org/event/eff-bay-area-maker-faire-2014> Join EFF at Maker Faire Bay Area! We are proud to support the rights of modern innovators and promote the spirit of DIY creativity and freedom. Stop by the EFF Maker Faire booth to learn more and become an official EFF member. *May 18-19, 2014 San Francisco, CA * Techno-Activism Third Mondays (TA3)<https://www.eff.org/event/techno-activism-third-mondays-ta3m-1> Techno-Activism Third Mondays (TA3M) are informal meetups that occur on the same date in many cities worldwide. It is designed to connect techno-activists and hacktivists who work on or with circumvention tools, and/or are interested in anti-censorship and anti-surveillance technology. TA3M are held in New York, Washington, DC, Amsterdam, Portland, Tokyo, and more. * May 19, 2014 EFF Offices 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco* Personal Democracy Forum (PDF)<https://www.eff.org/event/personal-democracy-forum-pdf> EFF's Rainey Reitman and Jillian York will speak at the Personal Democracy Forum. PDF brings together a thousand top opinion makers, political practitioners, technologists, and journalists from across the ideological spectrum for two days to network, exchange ideas, and explore how technology and wired citizens are changing politics, governance, and civil society. *June 5-6, 2014 New York, NY* How NSA Spying Can Affect Your Legal Case and What Steps You Can Take to Protect Your Client<https://www.eff.org/event/what-you-dont-know-can-hurt-you-how-nsa-spying-ca…> EFF Staff Attorney Hanni Fakhoury will give a one hour CLE presentation for the Bar Association of San Francisco, discussing how NSA and other intelligence communities gather and tip information to law enforcement agencies in routine criminal cases. He will also explain steps criminal defense attorneys can take to figure out if NSA derived evidence is being used against their clients. *June 19, 2014 Bar Association of San Francisco 301 Battery St, San Francisco, CA * EFF on [image: twitter] <http://twitter.com/eff> [image: facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/eff> [image: google plus] <https://plus.google.com/+eff> [image: identica]<https://identi.ca/eff>

3 4

Defining "impact" for Wikimedia programs, grants and evaluation
by ENWP Pine 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hi, I spent a few minutes searching on Meta for how "impact" is defined. What is the WMF definition? Some examples of places where "impact" is used: * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/FDC_portal/Impact_report_form * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Impact_report_form_Q%26A * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Learning/Round_1_2013/Impact * https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/05/02/beginning-understand-what-works-measu… * https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Program_evaluation_basics:_efficiency,_effe… I am not fond of the Boulmetis / Dutwin definition used in that last reference because short-term effects can be important and much easier to measure than long-term effects. For example, an administrator protecting a page can have the short-term effect of preventing editing and preventing an edit war, and the long term effects of that can be impossible to know, such as whether preventing an edit war prevented the situation from escalating to an Arbcom case with imposition of long-term blocks, and also whether preventing editing prevented important information from being added to the page by an occasional IP editor. I might suggest a rewrite of that entire page on "program evaluation basics" to make it simple. Right now it's a wall of text that's difficult to follow and, I feel, at least partly wrong. I think that Edward Galvez is working on some of these issues and I would be happy to have him or someone else in Evaluation thoughtfully redesign and rewrite that page to make it easy to follow for everyone including non-native English speakers. If I have a hard time with that page, you can imagine how difficult it is for someone who only understands English at an intermediate level. I would like to start with having a clear and simple definition of "impact" that makes sense in Wikimedia contexts, and some examples that are easy to follow. Thanks, Pine

6 5

Announcement by the Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland
by Nikolas Becker 20 May '14

20 May '14

Dear all, Pavel Richter has been Wikimedia Deutschland’s Executive Director since 2009. Over the course of the past five years he has established an organizational structure that serves as a solid basis for Wikimedia Deutschland’s free knowledge mission. For quite some time the Supervisory Board has been striving for a different strategic course for Wikimedia Deutschland, which will be illustrated by the strategy paper to be introduced at the coming general assembly. The Supervisory Board has come to the conclusion that it will not be able to implement this paper with the current Executive Director. Thus, the Supervisory Board and the Executive Director have agreed on jointly shaping a well-ordered transition. The association and Pavel Richter have agreed on a mutual separation to take place. There will be talks regarding the modalities of an amicable arrangement. On behalf of the Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland I would like to thank Pavel for his very good work and for both the professionalism and passion with which he has shaped the development of Wikimedia Deutschland. Nikolas Becker for the Supervisory Board of Wikimedia Deutschland Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. Tempelhofer Ufer 23/24 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.

4 3

[Wikimedia Announcements] Monthly report Wikimedia Nederland: April
by Sandra Rientjes Wikimedia Nederland 20 May '14

20 May '14

Wikimedia Nederland published it April report : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Nederl… It is included in this message as plain text. ==== COMMUNITY: supporting and mobilising volunteers and editors==== * Small grants programme WMNL gave a grant of € 200 for the organisation of a writing event on women and art. * Wiki-Saturdays Two Wiki-Saturdays, with 4 resp. 6 participants, were held in April. ==== WORK: content, collaboration and activity development==== * Wiki Loves Earth. A group of volunteers, supported by office staff, worked hard to prepare for the launch of Wiki Loves Earth on May 1. They have a developed a full programme of events in cooperation with the Netherlands' National Parks, focussing on uploading images and sounds. * Museum Naturalis cooperation WMNL will continue to work on the theme of nature, biodiversity and landscape after the international Wiki Loves Earth competition has finished. We met with representatives of Naturalis, the Museum of Natural History, to discuss cooperation. Already we have planned a editing event for October 4/5, but we are also discussing content donations. We want to link these activities to a concerted action to recruit new editors from (volunteer) organisations working on natural history. * Education Programme The consultants engaged to carry out a feasibility study for cooperation between WMNL and the education sector have started work. In April and May they will carry out interviews with representatives of institutes of higher education and with members of the international Wikimedia community. Their interim results will be presented to and discussed with the community on May 24. * GLAMwiki Toolset (mass-upload tool) The Amsterdam Museum hosted a GLAMwiki Toolset workshop on the 4th of April. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Museum, University Museum Utrecht, National Archives of the Netherlands, National Library of the Netherlands,Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision, Wikipedians in Residence and volunteers participated in this workshop. Every step from choosing suitable content to uploading it was covered during the workshop. The lessons learned are being collected in the |GLAMwiki Toolset Manual. * Wiki Loves Bieb First preparations were made for the monthly Wikipedia courses that will be hosted by the library in Amersfoort, starting on June the 13th. * Wikipedians in Residence The Wikipedians in Residence had a meeting at the WMNL office on the 28th of April. Two workshops were organized for employees of Sound and Vision in which they were encouraged to consider the platforms of Wikimedia when setting up new projects. * Wikidata Workshop The Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision hosted a Wikidata workshop given bij Gerard Meijssen on April 11th. The workshop was focussed on explaining what Wikidata is, to show how single and batch edits can be done and to discuss the different possibilities for GLAMs to use Wikidata. Apart from a variety of participants from the institute itself also the Rijksmuseum and Wikipedians in Residence were present. More workshops will be organised in 2014. * World War II - warmonuments April was war monuments month for WMNL. In cooperation with the Nationaal Comité 4 en 5 may, we asked members of the public to make and upload photos of warmonuments. More than 2,000 images were uploaded via the campaign template. WMNL will continue to focus on improving and adding to content concerning World War II. We are exploring cooperation with NIOD, the National institute for war, genocide and holocaust studies. More news in the next report. ====WMNL==== * Newsletter : An |issue of the newsletter was sent out. ====FUNDING==== * WMNL received a generous donation of €12,500 from a private donor. ====GLOBAL==== * Wikimedia Conference Berlin Chair Frans Grijzenhout, Board Member International Affairs Ad Huikeskoven en Executive Director Sandra Rientjes attended the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin. . * Program evaluation and design workshop, Berlin Sebastiaan ter Burg attended the Program Evaluation and Design workshop in Berlin to learn how to improve the "program manual" that WMNL already has developed. * Wiki Loves Monuments International. The final report on Wiki Loves Monuments International was submitted to the WMF. WMNL acted as fiscal sponsor to the project team, taking care of payments and accounting. ====GOVERNANCE==== * Board retreat The newly elected Board met for two days to discuss division of tasks and get acquainted. * New staff member Jolanda Adelaar joined the WMNL office team to work on finances and office management. She replaces Tom Kisters who left on May 1st to finalise his studies with an internship at an international accountancy firm. * Q1 report submitted We submitted our |report on activities in the first quarter to WMF. ====Upcoming==== * May 24: Education Programme -presentation and discussion at the Wikimedia office in Utrecht * May 24 Maps and Wikipedia meeting, Amsterdam * May 25: Wiki Loves Earth eventsin three National Parks Sandra Rientjes Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland tel. (+31) (0)30 3200238 mob. (+31) (0)6 31786379 www.wikimedia.nl *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht _______________________________________________ Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l

1 0

Wikidata vs Wikipedia
by Gerard Meijssen 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hoi, Amir Ladsgroup has developed reports that show differences between the date of birth and the date of death as known in the English Wikipedia and Wikidata. Such differences may be wrong in either Wikidata or Wikipedia. They are the ones that need attention, they are the ones where sources makes a real difference. At this stage Amir is finalising the code. Given that this software can run repeatedly, the results will change when the software l earns about changes in either Wikidata or Wikipedia. One practical question is where should these reports be located. It can be in both Wikipedia and Wikidata. It is likely that many similar reports reporting on different statements will become available. Thanks, GerardM https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report/Conflict_wit… https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Death_date_report/Conflict_wit… http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/05/wikipedia-vs-wikidata-qualitativ…

2 2

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Commons' frontpage probably shouldn't prominently feature a decontextualised stack of corpses.
by ENWP Pine 20 May '14

20 May '14

Hi Keegan, I looked for equivalent Meta policies before posting the links to English Wikipedia. Canvassing is referenced on Meta and Commons although there is no page on Meta or Commons specifically describing a canvassing policy that I see. Perhaps there should be, since both wikis seem to have an unwritten rule against canvassing. I believe I was clear that the RfC guidelines and the Drama essay are from English Wikipedia but I think they are the best practice to follow here, and that this is my opinion only. I agree that posting a notification to this list was appropriate, but not with forking or moving the discussion to here. Pine

23 86

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Timothy Sandole and (apparently) $53, 690 of WMF funding
by ENWP Pine 19 May '14

19 May '14

I'm giving this thread a poke because we're still waiting for answers to questions. The most recent email was from Srikanth on May 7. Pine

2 1

RfC Let's Talk! Program Evaluation and Metrics
by Jaime Anstee 19 May '14

19 May '14

Greetings! With apologies for any cross-posting, we are contacting you all now as we are reaching out to the Wikimedia community and all program leaders, evaluators, volunteers, and others who hold a stake and/or interest in Wikimedia program evaluation and design. We present this request for comment (RfC) and a new community discussion page on the evaluation portal: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Parlor/Dialogue Let's Talk! Program Evaluation and Metrics As we come upon one year’s time since our Program Evaluation and Design team began on the initiative to build program evaluation capacity, we’d like to hear from the community of Wikimedia -- program leaders, evaluators, volunteers, and other stakeholders in program evaluation and design -- about your perspectives on those efforts. Background: The focus of the evaluation capacity building initiative is peer learning, practice sharing, and the adoption of shared language and approach to program evaluation across the movement. This initiative is to support the discoverability and innovation of programs that will achieve high impact. Importantly, the team is charged with developing learning resources and tools to support program leaders to self-evaluate their program efforts and impacts. Current RfC: Please visit the dialogue pages to share your perspective on: * How we should evaluate and report on the program evaluation and design capacity-building initiative. * The evaluation learning opportunities and resources made available. * Program metrics piloted in the beta reports. * How we should assess grantmaking to groups and individuals. Visit https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/Parlor/Dialogue for all the details and to participate. Please be encouraged to also forward this announcement to any lists or individuals you think might be interested. On behalf of the Program Evaluation and Design team, thank you for your time and attention, we hope to hear from you in our portal. Best regards, Jaime -- Jaime Anstee, Ph.D Program Evaluation Specialist Wikimedia Foundation +1.415.839.6885 ext 6869 www.wikimediafoundation.org Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! *https://donate.wikimedia.org <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>*

1 0

next Wikidata IRC office hour
by Lydia Pintscher 19 May '14

19 May '14

Hey everyone :) I'll be doing another Wikidata office hour on IRC. It will take place on May 19th at 5PM UTC in #wikimedia-office. For your timezone please see http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Wikidata+office+ho… I'll be giving a status update and then answer whatever Wikidata-related questions you have. Hope to see many of you there. Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher Product Manager for Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 10963 Berlin www.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.

2 3

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Wikimedia-l May 2014