I would like to get the question about conflict resolution at meta
raised again, again about the same issue. For a moment it seemed to
have been resolved by moving the desirability of image suppression to
a separate page, but that page has now also become the subject of an
edit war. Christiaan is reverting Gerard because his arguments 'show
bad faith' (which apparently is a reason to forbid them being spoken),
Gerard reverts Christiaan because his edits are 'vandalism' and 'not
NPOV'.
Apparently the two are not only disagreeing about whether image
suppression is a good idea, but even about which arguments against it
are acceptable enough to be on meta. Who can resolve this conflict?
Andre Engels