Wikipedia Romania (Ronline) wrote:
>I think the dialect vs language debate is
>basically about which languages are fixed and which aren't. Dialects
>generally don't tend to be standardised and recognised, whereas languages
>are.
e.g., English. Er, hold on ...
- d.
Jimbo wrote:
>I want to use a hypothetical example so as to avoid the risk of speaking
>ignorantly on any particular case. There is no need for a Wikipedia to
>save the "Bostonian" language, because there is no such language. There
>is, most likely, a Bostonian _accent_, or perhaps (if we are generous) a
>Bostonian _dialect_, but there is no Bostonian _language_.
>This is particularly true if we are speaking of formal written
>Bostonian, the written language of the people of Boston. It might be
>hard for me to understand the slang of some cabdrivers and bartenders in
>Boston, but I can read their newspapers just fine.
English is, I think, a special case. Look at some newspaper articles
from Jamaica:
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20051114/flair/flair7.html
Are those quotes in English, a dialect or a language? It's just thrown
in the middle there with the expectation that the English-speaking
readers will take it in their stride. I'd go "huh?" but evidently I'd
be wrong to do so.
Half the local dialects in England would probably qualify as European
minor languages if they hadn't been swamped by the south-eastern
version via the BBC.
- d.
Hello,
The website has been refurbished in the past few
weeks.
You may see it at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home
If some people feel like improving the design, please
do (we can work on this on meta or on the foundation
site depending on those interested).
Note that the main page offers various places for
input, either from the board/officers or from editors
themselves. Amongst the latest additions, please see
the opinion of an editor on Le Louvres, the famous
french museum, hosting art such as La Joconde, and
which has recently taken the stance to forbid entirely
any picture taking.
This is currently available in english, french and
german.
Here :
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/It_is_forbidden_to_take_pictures_%21
The next steps are currently these ones :
* Setting up a new complete board report (do not go
for now, it is still under work :-))
* We expect a complete financial report of the last
fiscal year within a month or so
* I invite you to work on
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_use_or_reuse_our_content
to put on the foundation site later
What I would love to is to set up a FAQ in the next
weeks. I only created the page for now
(http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_use_or_reuse_our_content)
and invite everyone to put what he thinks are the most
basic questions anyone not knowing *anything* about
the Foundation could find useful. I'll go around here
and there in village pumps to ask for help on this.
For now, just knowing which could be the top 15
questions on the organisation would be great.
Other than that, remember that you are welcome to
participate. If someone does an interview of an
important person... if someone wants to make a report
on Wikimania, or clarify a legal issue, or is ready to
write a general article on one of our projects, or the
wikireaders... please do not feel shy and contact us
:-)
Ant
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> Wiki projects do not need to know my IP address, and I'm not going to
> provide it. If you don't want my edits under those conditions, it's your
> loss
I agree entirely with this statement. When I compare (anecdotally) the
cost of accepting Tor edits with their benefit, the cost far outweighs
any gain. I would not easily suggest limiting any source of positive
contributions, but anonymizing hosts are not a net positive; quite the
opposite. We should not need to know your IP, but by insuring we cannot
know your IP you also add yourself to a class of users who are not
beneficial to the Wikimedia projects. This is an opt-in situation for
you, and Wikimedia has no ability to separate you from the spammers and
vandals who likewise prevent us from knowing their IP.
Anonymizers should not be considered a problem, but rather a very useful
identifying tool. Make their anonymity a feature, rather than a drawback.
Amgine
--- Samuel Klein <sjklein(a)hcs.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Soufron's points suggest the foundation avoid approving accreditation or
> similar processes; leaving it entirely to community groups. If someone
> wanted to sue the 'editors' for actions by someone with a press pass, they
> would have to do exactly that -- just as one would have to sue individual
> encyclopedia editors for libel.
To me they suggested that the whole process should be entirely removed. I asked
of clarification on that point.
-- mav
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Soufron's points suggest the foundation avoid approving accreditation or
similar processes; leaving it entirely to community groups. If someone wanted
to sue the 'editors' for actions by someone with a press pass, they would have
to do exactly that -- just as one would have to sue individual encyclopedia
editors for libel.
> And this leads to my third and more important point. Accreditating people
> will transform the Foundation from being a publisher to becoming an editor...
The foundation is not a publisher afaik, and I don't see how any policy
decided by community members would make it an editor.
SJ
(ps - If you write for EB or publish an article in the Boston Globe, there
is someone out there protecting you from personal liability. Not so with
Wikipedia and sister projects; perhaps we need a neon warning on the edit
screen, just below the DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION.)
On 11/11/05, Jean-Baptiste Soufron <jbsoufron(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Unions accreditating journalists will certainly be mad at it (as in
> France), and it would picture the foundation as a liable editor rather
> as a not-liable publisher.
I thought it was the position of the foundation that it wasn't even a
publisher, but rather an ISP, essentially a common carrier.
Hallo alltogehter,
found this Call of Paper and thought it will be kewl if someone can
present the view of the Wikimedia Foundation. The deadline for
submissions is the 15.11.05 but when you signal interest it can be
extendet.
Contact:
Erich Schweighofer,U.Vienna&WZRI, A
Erich.Schweighofer(a)univie.ac.at
I have absolutly no time in moment to do it myself. Please write me a
short massage if you will do it ;-)
PatrickD
-----------------------------------------------------------
Call for Papers and Contributions
KnowRight 2006
Knowledge Rights –
Legal, Societal and Related Technological Aspects
http://KnowRight06.ocg.at
University of Vienna (Juridicum - Law Faculty Building)
16 - 17 February 2006
Organized by: Austrian Computer Society (OCG) jointly with
IRIS (Internationales Rechtsinformatik Symposium)
http://www.univie.ac.at/RI/IRIS2006/
CONFERENCE OUTLINE
This conference will resume the general interest of the KnowRight
Conferences, held since 1995, on the interaction of Intellectual Property
Rights, related Information Rights, Ethical Problems, and Information
Dependent Technology. It will be supported by the Austrian Computer
Society and will be held in tandem with the IRIS conference
(Internationales Rechtsinformatik Symposion). It will provide strong
emphasis on the social environment in which the intellectual and
information property system, information services, mobile applications,
e-commerce and the electronic civil society evolve.
The concept of an ”Information Society” or "Knowledge Society" is
neither well defined nor are its foundations and implications well
understood. Governments and authorities in many countries and
regions (e.g. the EU) are still discussing options to establish and
regulate at least special aspects of an Information Society. Increasingly
it becomes harder to master future technologies with traditional laws
based on national or regional methods and concepts. We have to
develop new forms of international legal regimes and practices. They
should empower coordinated means to avoid abuse of such new
technologies.. Fairness should be preserved in the emerging non-local
availability of up to now local resources. Open Source and Open
Content are investigated as examples of dynamic innovations of legal
concepts. The conference will discuss which requirements - such as
safety and security of related methods and media - must be fulfilled and
how these requirements may be enforced. Which regulations and
preventive measures should be promoted in the light of conflicting
interests. Regulating the flow of information must guarantee that
clashes between individual rights (e.g. of intellectual/ industrial
property,
privacy and data protection) and collective demands (e.g. for security,
universal access as well as preserving and expanding the heritage of
mankind) are treated and resolved in human ways. Information in the
public domain on the wired or unwired communication channels should
deserve special attention. Commercial interests should be balanced
with moral and civic obligations.
MAJOR CONFERENCE TOPICS
Intellectual Property
• Status of IP law for e-products and e-services
• Bundle of WIPO Treaties: To be enlarged?
• TRIPS: Efficient against large scale IP infringements?
• Competition and regulation in the music and video industry
• Media and entertainment law - responsibility and liability of IPproviders
• Rules for mobile applications
• Private use and fair use of intellectual property
• Rights management systems
• Open source and open content
• Open access: Copyright restrictions for science and research
• Copyright and copyleft
• Global trademarks
• Software patents
Access to and Reuse of Public Sector and Private Information
• Freedom of information and data protection
• Access to public documents
• Legal framework of public sector information reuse
• Socioeconomic conditions of PSI reuse
• Extent of and limitations on database protection in Europe
• Long term archiving of public and private information
Network Security
• Technological proposals and implementations
• Embedding regulation into hard- and software
• Regulations and their development
• Privacy and identification - electronic identities
• Authentification, authorisation and remuneration
• Electronic signatures
• Fraud on the internet: Tech-tools and legal framework
• Online policing
Data protection
• Pervasive computing
• Automatic “forgetting” of database
• Retention of data
• Legal means against violation of data protection
Information Ethics
• Information in the public domain - balancing commercial interests with
moral and civic obligations
• Fair use concept at the global level: equitable use of global and local
knowledge
• Access to personal data: protecting citizens' and users’ security and
privacy versus public interest
• Equity in the access to information (tariffs, fees, taxes)
• Special regulation for developing countries?
• Free speech and censorship
• Minors access to violence and adult content
• Age verification and privacy
• Responsibility of internet professionals
Don't feel restricted if your innovative topic fits the general purpose of
the conference but none of the special items on the list.
PROGRAM COMMITTEE (co-chairs bold)
John Bing, Univ. of Oslo, NO, - jonb(a)jus.uio.no (Jon Bing)
Walter Blocher, Vienna U Busin Adm, AT walter.blocher(a)wu-wien.ac.at
Daniele Bourcier, University of Paris II, FR - bourcier(a)msh-paris.fr
Alfred Büllesbach, Bremen,DE Alfred.Buellesbach(a)daimlerchrysler.com
Gunter Ertl, Regional Court of Appeal, AT - g.ertl(a)kabsi.at
Fernando Galindo, Univ. of Zaragoza, ES, cfa(a)posta.unizar.es
Jens Gaster, European Commission, EU - Jens.Gaster(a)cec.eu.int
Thomas Hoeren, U.of Münster, DE, - Hoeren(a)uni-muenster.de
Bernt Hugenholtz, Univ. of Amsterdam, NL, hugenholtz(a)ivir.nl
Dietmar Jahnel, University of Salzburg, AT - Dietmar.Jahnel(a)sbg.ac.at
Veith Risak, Univ.of Salzburg & Bratislava AT,CZ - risak(a)ocg.or.at
Ahti Saarenpaa, Univ. Helsinki FI, Ahti.Saarenpaa(a)ulapland.fi
Peter P Sint, Austrian Academy of Science, A - sint(a)oeaw.ac.at
(Coordinator)
A Min Tjoa, Univ. of Vienna, AT, tjoa(a)ifs.tuwien.ac.at
Erich Schweighofer,U.Vienna&WZRI, A Erich.Schweighofer(a)univie.ac.at
David Vaver, Univ.of Oxford, UK - david.vaver(a)st-peters.oxford.ac.uk
Peter Wahlgren, Univ. Stockholm, SE, Peter.Wahlgren(a)juridicum.su.se
Andreas Wiebe,Vienna U.Busin Adm.AT andreas.wiebe(a)wu-wien.ac.at
SUBMISSION OF CONTRIBUTIONS
Papers should be of high quality, original, unpublished, and not
submitted elsewhere. Authors of papers are asked to submit an
abstract or a full text version (strongly recommended) of the
respective contribution (abstract: 2-4 pages including main references,
full text: 8 to 10 pages).
The guidelines for the final version are available at
http://www.ocg.at/publikationen/books/paper.html.
Submissions of contributions to the conference be handed in as printout
and in electronic form to
Austrian Computer Society
Wollzeile 1-3
A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe
DEADLINES
• Submission of full papers or abstracts: 15 November 2005
• Notification of acceptance: 30 November 2005
• Final paper: 20 December 2006 (some extensions may be
negotiated)
Due to the tight timetable and the target to have the published
proceedings available during the conference try to send the
papers by the beginning of November.
CONFERENCE VENUE
The conference will take place in the University of Vienna (Juridicum -
Law Faculty building) in the city centre.
CONFERENCE LANGUAGE
The conference language willl be English.
PARTICIPATION
If you are interested in participation or to keep informed on the further
development contact the
Austrian Computer Society (OCG) KnowRight 2006
Wollzeile 1-3
A-1010 Vienna
E-Mail: KR06(a)ocg.at
Phone: +43 1 512 02 35, Fax: +43 1 512 02 35 9
or visit the conference webpages:
http://KnowRight06.ocg.at (or http://www.univie.ac.at/RI/IRIS2006/ )
REGISTRATION AND PROCEEDINGS
Authors should have registered by 10 Jan. 2006.
Participation including conference proceedings and social event:
EUR 70,--
The proceedings will be published by the Austrian Computer Society
and will appear in the books@ocg series.
Ec wrote:
>daniwo59 at aol.com wrote:
>>Although I have not been following this discussion, I was asked this evening
>>to grant 5 arbitrators on the English Wikipedia CheckUser powers.
>Are that many really needed?
Six would be nice, yes please, kthx.
Is this now going to be held up by another subgroup wanting to
re-committee the entire issue from top to bottom? I'd hope not.
- d.
Hi, this is something I asked on irc in #wikimedia earlier today, so
apologies to those of you who have already read this.
On projects like Wikinews which do not use the GFDL, Mediawiki Help
pages are still copied from Meta to the Help: namespace as an aid to
editors. However, I noticed that for these pages, (for instance,
<http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Help:Diff>), the only copyright notice is
the Wikinews default on the bottom of the page: "All content created
after September 25, 2005 is available under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 2.5 License unless otherwise specified." Of
course, at the top of the same page, it is acknowledged that the text
is copied from <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Diff>, which, like
all pages on Meta, carries the legend "Content is available under GNU
Free Documentation License."
My question is, is the Wikinews page kosher with the GFDL? If so,
why? If not, what specifically must be done to make it compliant?
As I first started poking around these pages on behalf of a non-WMF
MediaWiki instance that would also like to mirror Help pages from Meta
locally, I would appreciate it if the general case of a non-GFDL wiki
using GFDL help pages could be addressed, and not just the particular
instance of Wikinews. Since we're brand-new and haven't chosen a
license yet, this will influence our direction in coming to a decision
there.
Many thanks for your time,
--Michael Noda