Dear all, Regarding Matthew's question on Freedom of Panorama and copyright of statues, Katie's answer is correct and pretty much complete. One of the main reasons that we've pretty much limited WLM-US to NRHP sites is that statues can have copyright problems. The NRHP lists are maybe 5% statues, essentially all published before 1978, and I've never seen a copyright problem with one. The Wall, Korean War Memorial and a few similar mall memorials are not on the list. To photograph pre-1978 statues in the US please do the following song and dance: Check with the SIRIS (Smithsonian) site or NRHP data to get the date it was unveiled to the public (date of publication) - all you need to do is show the date is pre-1978. When you photograph the statue, get close up and walk around it, looking for a visible copyright notice. If you can't see a copyright notice, then it's not visible :-) and you are free to upload it to Commons. Can we trust absolute newbies to take this song and dance seriously? (Yes, I sing and dance all the time) I don't think the newbies would take it as deadly serious as some folks at Commons do it. That's the main reason Public Art is not on this year's WLM-US agenda. It's also a good example of how copyright paranoia effects Commons. To tell you the truth, I don't think that pre-WWII sculptors understood copyright in the same way we do now. Almost no sculptures from that period have copyright notices, and I believe when they do they were referring to bronze or stone copies, rather than photographic copies. So Remington's 1910-copyrighted statue is one of the most photographed statues in Philadelphia, and has been since 1910! Buildings, boats, railway locomotives, cornfields, big rocks, breakwaters and other NRHP sites don't have this copyright problem. All the best, Pete Ekman === Message: 3 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:22:32 -0400 From: aude <aude.wiki(a)gmail.com> To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition <wikilovesmonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] FoP and monuments Message-ID: <CAE4hJ8dRP_Q4XYpDrFr5KcfLTV=br0PP8z39z_dPXJ_FSPob3A(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Matthew Roth <mroth(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: I believe the Vietnam Veterans Memorial wall is okay, however the Vietnam Womens Memorial and the Korean War Memorial are both copyrighted and it's been enforced. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120515/14051218928/postal-service-could-… 1978 and 1989 are the magic dates relating to copyright of public artwork http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Public_art_and_copyrights_in_the_… Per the freedom of panorama and other guidelines (see above) Note that the rules vary greatly from country to country. Permanently situated outdoor sculpture in Canada is okay for Commons, but not the U.S. and other places. Cheers, Katie