On 27/10/12 12:47, Roel Balingit wrote: I find that approach poses a problem if they don't appear, since you are publishing them as winners, then retreating. We had several ineligible pictures preselected, but luckily none of them reached the top positions.

Hi Cristian, I agree with the principle. That being said, it is up to the local organizers to interpret it to some extent. Many monument photos have not been identified by the uploader because they couldn't find their way in the lists - and they were later identified by the volunteers. In my opinion, that doesn't disqualify the image, because in the end it has been identified. However, this rule does put the burden with the uploader. If for whatever reason our volunteers cannot find the monument either (bad description?) or they are just lazy - that is his problem and we can disqualify the image. The same goes imho for the email address requirement. We don't specify /when/ it has to be given. If the local organizers are willing to put in that effort I'm happy if they contact him otherwise and ask him to activate the email address. However, it does put the burden with the participant - if it takes too long for the opinion of the organizers, they can disqualify the user from receiving a prize. So my advice would definitely be: if you contact him otherwise, give clear deadlines. If he doesn't respond before a certain moment: too bad, prize gone. Best, Lodewijk 2012/10/27 Cristian Consonni <kikkocristian(a)gmail.com>