Hi all,
New update:
The Italian team had some calls with the fundraising team and it resulted
in:
* Wiki Loves Monuments gets the whole 4th week of September. So we will
have the WLM banner alone the first and the last week.
* WLM IT is discussing with the community a message in the Main Page of
Wikipedia
* WMF will try to put a link to WLM in the banner
* WMF will put a link to WLM in the Thank You letter for donors.
* WMF is helping WLM Italy with a blogpost in the blog, and social media
fire
They made clear this won't happen again.
To me, the only improvements is their promise it won't happen again, what
we certainly keep them having their promise in future, and that the amount
of time the Wiki Loves Monuments banner is shown will be 50% of the time.
The rest of the outcomes is lousy and they sold us empty boxes. Wiki Loves
Monuments depends for about 99% on a CentralNotice banner. Most visitors to
Wikipedia do not visit the main page of a wiki. I do not believe a small
link to WLM in a large fundraising banner would help or is seen. I do not
believe that a link in the Thank You letter for donors would work. A
blogpost will be written anyway, as Wiki Loves Monuments is the largest
project of the Wikimedia movement, but still it would not reach to the core
people Wiki Loves Monuments is aiming at. And a social media fire, I have
no believe in it that WMF would have any control in such and the core
infrastructure is not under control by WMF.
And still no explanation why it is not possible to move the fundraising
banner to a month later...
I can only conclude that we have been put off, in Dutch: afgescheept
worden (literally: being shipped of).
At such having a blocking banner is sad news. A competition is large
ruined by it.
What I consider the most demotivating is the play the fundraising team of
WMF has played. I certainly do not consider it fair play. Too many empty
promises, dividing the community to get less resistance, no fair
negotiations, usage of the inexperience of volunteers, and more.
And even after explaining the community perspective many times by multiple
people, I still have the impression some people in WMF still do not really
get it.
I had the occasion in the past weeks that I spoke with people from WMF who
are working for the foundation for some years, and I had to explain what
Wiki Loves Monuments is. (And that was not the first time.) It is the
largest project of the movement, recognised as largest photo contest in the
world, and some WMF people do not know or understand. I was so friendly to
explain it of course, but it gave mixed feelings.
And even after explaining the community perspective many times by multiple
people, they do not really get it.
Lessons to be learned:
* Do not assume that the fundraising team takes the best position for the
movement, they have a target to make.
* Do not assume the fundraising team plays a fair play. They have a lot of
weight and use it.
* Do not assume that their first offer (in case of a blocking banner) is a
balanced, reasonable and well thought one.
* Do not expect them to know how much the impact is of something.
* Do expect them to offer empty shells/boxes/etc and are not impressed by
those.
* Say always no if they ask if a blocking banner or two banners at the
same time is okay. It has a devastating effect on your results. Yes you
can, some chapters did and that was taken into account seriously.
* Always have the complete team involved in the communication, and even
think of asking advisers (from outside WMF) for support and feedback on the
proposals. Always have someone involved who has years of experience in this
matter, otherwise you loose and the whole community looses.
But I think the best lesson learned is: with every blocking banner, let
the community publicly decide what should be chosen.
Romaine
2015-08-30 14:00 GMT+02:00 Steinsplitter Wiki <steinsplitter-wiki(a)live.com
I 100% agree with rupert's thoughts.
Wiki(p|m)edia was and is mad be volunteers, therefore volunteer first
should apply. Volunteers are contributing the content for exactly zero
dollars per hour. It is all because of free knowledge and other stuff, but
not about money. It looks like money is fore some people moor important
than free knowledge. It is frustrating...
Regards,
Steinsplitter
From: rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 21:35:46 +0200
To: janbart(a)wikimedia.org; patricio.lorente(a)gmail.com;
me.lyzzy(a)gmail.com;
ubifrieda(a)gmail.com; jmh649(a)gmail.com;
darekj(a)alk.edu.pl; denny.vrandecic(a)kit.edu; jwales(a)wikia.com;
stu(a)wikimedia.org
CC: wikilovesmonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org;
wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments]
Wiki Loves Monuments
in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising
dear board,
allow me to directly ask you to stop these fundraising persons to spoil
wiki loves monuments because of less than intelligent KPIs. WMF cannot
and
should not behave like an elephant in the
porcelain shop. there is a
simple
technical solution to the problem below, to have
a combined banner for
WLM
and donation. it is impossible that more money at
stake as is covered by
the reserves, isn't it? i am really lacking words here ... the only
ones i
could find would not be compliant with the
friendly space policy. if we
as
movement do not follow through the
"volunteer first" rule than it is
better
to dissolve WMF, or split it in two parts, one
holding the rights to the
web URLs, i.e. right to banner, the other one employing all the people
doing some work.
best,
rupert
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> Sorry for the long mail but we wanted to explain the situation for
> Wikimedia Italia.
> The conversation is going on and it's better to clear some important
> points.
>
> In the second week of August Wikimedia Italia has been contacted by
> Kalliope Tsouroupidou and later by Jessica Robell, who explained that
the
> Wikimedia Foundation was planning to have a
fundraising campaign in
Italy
> in September.
> We have been surprised by that, since Wiki Loves Monuments is
well-known to
> run in September, and it has been like that
for years.
> Moreover, there has been a similar clash in 2014: we discussed for
several
> days, and in the end we reached a
compromise, and the FR banners went
live
> just for the last days.
> It was not perfect, but we had WLM banners for almost all September.
> This year the clash is on the whole month of September. Given the
history,
> and the very fact that Wikimedia Italia has
planned WLM and written
so in
> the FDC application, we feel that WMIT has
not been negligible in
matters
> of
> communication.
> We are not *happy* with the situation,
> the very existence of the clash, the fact that all this appeared in
the
> middle of August, while we were all on
holiday and just few weeks
before
> the beginning of WLM.
> We just decided not to pick up a fight, as we believe in constructive
> conversation and negotiation.
> The agreement we reached is very painful for WMIT and WLM: it's just
better
> than not having the banners at all, or to
have them for just a few
days in
> the middle of September.
> Conversations with the FR team has been firm, but polite: this does
not
> mean that we are happy about what is
happening.
> Moreover, we will have to discuss with FDC to renegotiate expected
results
> for WLM in 2015.
>
> Having the fundraising campaign in September in Italy has a clear
negative
> impact on Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest
project of Wikimedia
Italia.
> This will not only likely reduce the number
of participants and
uploaded
> pictures, but will also put us in a
difficult position in front of our
> sponsors and partners, including 200+ municipalities, 100+ cultural
> institutions, and some major partners, like FIAF (the Federation of
Italian
> photographers' associations), ICOM (the
International Council of
Museums),
> the Toscana Foto Festival (a major photo
festival), Touring Club
Italiano
> (the largest Italian touristic association),
and others. WMIT spends
> thousands of euros in WLM each year - not because we waste money, but
> because we have higher stakes.
>
> This year, we will have in the Italian Jury international renowned
> photographers like (prabably: yet to be confirmed) Steve McCurry (
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_McCurry) and Franco Fontana (
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco_Fontana).
> This year, in June, we were received by several politicians from the
> Italian Parliament for an official meeting regarding the law we are
> fighting
> as WMIT.
>
> Because of the specific challenges we face, WLM in Italy goes beyond
being
> a photographic competition and is also an
opportunity to create
> relationships and advocate for the freedom of taking pictures of
monuments.
>
> Italy does not have "freedom of panorama".
> Worst, Italy does not have freedom of panorama for any kind of
monuments,
> even if copyright has expired.
> We need to ask for permission to make pictures of monuments. For.
Every.
> Monument.
> We have to create lists of monuments to be photographed. There is no
> official list of monuments in Italy.
>
> There is *extensive* documentation here:
>
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Italian_cultural_heritage_on_the_Wikimedia_…
>
> This is very important to know to put in perspective WLM Italy stats:
>
http://stats.wikilovesmonuments.cl/italy. As an example, it is the
reason
> why we have so many participants who
contribute for few pics each. In
2014
> alone, we had 1038 uploaders, but we were
only 6th in terms of number
of
> photos.
>
> The global fundraising is essential to our movement.
> It funds Wikipedia operations, software development, the Wikimedia
> Foundation, many chapters and affiliates, and, of course, also Wiki
Loves
> Monuments (even tough in Italy it is
primarily funded from other
sources).
> The global fundraising is meant to support
the Wikimedia movement:
but, for
> this very reason, it is a pity to have it
clashing to one of the very
> activities it is meant to support.
> Especially since we are not talking about a 2 hours editathon in a
small
> library in the middle of nowhere, but about
an international
competition
> who ended up in the Guinnes World Records,
bringing thousands of
pictures
> to the Wikimedia projects.
> We understand that fundraising is not an easy job, especially when it
is
> done on a global level. Yet we feel obliged
to use donors money to
build
> and deliver the best projects we can:
firstly out of respect for all
the
> people who decided to donate their time,
their money or their career
to the
> movement; secondly because a badly executed
projects could also have a
> negative impact on the next fundraising campaigns.
> We are all part of the same movement: the work of the WMF fundraising
team
> is strictly linked to that of the community.
We would like to be
confident
> that what is happening now won't happen
for a third time, and that in
the
> future we will be able to communicate more
effectively and work more
> collaboratively.
> We really are looking forward a more effective cooperation with WMF
and all
> other Wikimedia Affiliates: collaboration is
the very pillar of all
the
> Wikimedia movement.
>
> We would like to thank all the people who supported us and gave us
opinions
> and advices on this mailing list and
elsewhere.
> We are very proud to be part of such a great community, and we would
like
> to see it become wider and bigger.
>
> Andrea Zanni
> for the board of Wikimedia Italia
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>