I second WSC (below)
The specific context for WP:NRHP in the US is that we have county lists with links (often red links) to an article on each of the sites and a photo (sometimes blank) in the next column.
From the info on the US page linked to --- I can now tell that 50.9%
of the photo slots in the lists (of about 87,000 sites) now have photos, but I can't tell how many have red links. Anyway somebody could do this?
And if you really want to practice your wizardry, could you tell me how many have red links plus a photo (these are especially good articles to start).
Any info appreciated.
BTW - "Trick or Treat!" and Happy Halloween
Pete Ekman User:Smallbones
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:06:57 +0000 From: WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] determining how many photos used in articles Message-ID: CAAanWP3z2QZKTg8YLsd_DvLuAr_srtL7-mRf7-j4C6Gn6gvnoA@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Also is it possible to create lists of wikipedia articles without images that are about monuments that now have images on Commons?
In a few weeks I'm running another workshop for donors who are willing to give some time to Wikipedia, and the more straightforward I can make image adding the more successful the event will be, I've already got a list of articles in the UK that we probably have images for, but a list of monuments that we definitely have images for would be better.
WSC
HOn Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:40:17 -0400, Peter Ekman wrote:
I second WSC (below)
The specific context for WP:NRHP in the US is that we have county lists with links (often red links) to an article on each of the sites and a photo (sometimes blank) in the next column.
From the info on the US page linked to --- I can now tell that 50.9%
of the photo slots in the lists (of about 87,000 sites) now have photos, but I can't tell how many have red links. Anyway somebody could do this?
And if you really want to practice your wizardry, could you tell me how many have red links plus a photo (these are especially good articles to start).
Any info appreciated.
Hi Peter,
may be I misunderstand the problem, but you know the total # of NRHP listings, and you also known how many articles were tagged as belonging to the NRHP project. The vast majority of those articles should be lists + articles on the monuments. The rest are red links, no? Admittedly tagging is a bit lagging, at least very few of the articles I recently created were tagged.
Cheers Yaroslav
Hi,
probably this would be helped if you would introduce an extra parameter, one which has the title of the article about the monument. Because not in every case a link will be a link to the monument article. For example, a description could be: "Holy Spirit Church, known amonst others for being the parish church of [[Martin Luther King]]" (just making this one up). The fact that the link to Martin Luther King is blue doesn't say anything about the monument of course. You see this especially a lot in for example countries like India with many mausoleums and mosques/fortresses named after people and villages.
Best, Lodewijk
2012/10/31 Peter Ekman pdekman@gmail.com
I second WSC (below)
The specific context for WP:NRHP in the US is that we have county lists with links (often red links) to an article on each of the sites and a photo (sometimes blank) in the next column.
From the info on the US page linked to --- I can now tell that 50.9% of the photo slots in the lists (of about 87,000 sites) now have photos, but I can't tell how many have red links. Anyway somebody could do this?
And if you really want to practice your wizardry, could you tell me how many have red links plus a photo (these are especially good articles to start).
Any info appreciated.
BTW - "Trick or Treat!" and Happy Halloween
Pete Ekman User:Smallbones
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:06:57 +0000 From: WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] determining how many photos used in articles Message-ID: < CAAanWP3z2QZKTg8YLsd_DvLuAr_srtL7-mRf7-j4C6Gn6gvnoA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Also is it possible to create lists of wikipedia articles without images that are about monuments that now have images on Commons?
In a few weeks I'm running another workshop for donors who are willing to give some time to Wikipedia, and the more straightforward I can make image adding the more successful the event will be, I've already got a list of articles in the UK that we probably have images for, but a list of monuments that we definitely have images for would be better.
WSC
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org