To have a fair comparison, you would have to limit the benchmark to uploads
by regular users (and exclude batches by institutions) and limit it to
images of course (not sure if that was the case). Could someone do that?
Lodewijk
2014/1/11 Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada <emijrp(a)gmail.com>
It is very cool to have so much quality images from a
simple idea as WLM
contest.
Making some numbers:
* 2000/(365191/100) = 0.54% of images from WLM 2012 are of good quality
* 60348/(19880404/100) = 0.30% of images from whole Commons are of good
quality
So WLM images quality is better than files uploaded in other months? That
is against the belief/opinions that WLM users upload junk.
I got the 60348 figure from
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Quality_images
2013/12/6 Tomasz W. Kozlowski <tomasz(a)twkozlowski.net>
Hi!
I am happy to announce that today, almost
fourteen months after its end,
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 has reached a beautiful milestone in terms of
Quality images; there are now exactly two thousand (2,000) files in
[[Category:Quality images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2012]]!
The lucky milestone picture is a photograph of a house at 41 Mark St in
the Austrian municipality of Neufelden, Upper Austria, taken by Michael
Kranewitter who goes by the user name of [[User:Geiserich77]].
My congratulations to Michael and to everyone who has helped reach this
great milestone. Well done everyone!
Tomasz W. Kozlowski
a.k.a. [[user:odder]]
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org