Last year Wikimedia Spain only listed monuments declared "Bien de Interés
Cultural" and registered and listed on Ministry site, with the code given by
ministry. But this site is not very accurated. Many regional goverments have their own
site with their own ID, different from ministry. And these lists are usually more
accurated and they have more monuments not listed in the site of the ministry.
Why do I say this? Because we find monuments with two different ID (one
given by ministry and another by regional goverment). Both are official.
Must we show both? In my opinion yes, because both ID are useful and
encycopedical information. How does it afect to the database of WLM? Examples of this case
could be: Catalonia, Aragon, Murcia, Valencia or Andalucia.
But usually, like in Castille and León or Basque Country, there is not an
ID available in their sites. In these two cases we can find a unique number for
identifing them in the url. Could we use this number as ID?
And then, there is a third case. When we have monuments but nowhere there is a ID or
something like that available. What can we do in this cases? Could we create an ID for the
contest? How can we show that this code is not official to wikipedia readers? Examples:
Navarre or Cantabria.
I'm very busy in my real life at this moment, but in one month I'll be active
another time in this project.
Thank you for your opinions, suggestions and advices.
Regards!!
Santiago Navarro
Wikimedia España
user:Millars