Another question for Tpt: how far is the implementation of the Visual
Editor inside the Proofread Extension?
Who's working on it? Just you, as always?
Aubrey
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, zdzislaw <zdzislaw.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2015-08-11 11:28 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at
gmail.com
:
Then it seems that the quality level has not the same meaning on
every wikisources. Typo such as « rn » intead of « m » are usually
removed on the red or yellow step on fr.ws (and such obvious error
can be seen before editing, reviewing the final render code seems enough
to me).
on pl ws it should be done on "without text" -> red step
for me all typo should be gone at the previous
stage (and
personally, I don't go from red to yellow if there is still such typo
mistakes).
should be... but statistically on red-> yellow step I find 2-4 typos, on
yellow-> green step - 1-2 typos (on fr ws too); if on yellow-> green step I
could not found any typos, I do not change its status immediately, leave it
on another day to be sure.
I'll write it again ... that is not safe to validate a page without
reviewing its wikicode. A BGB at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page
namespace WITHOUT displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's
a bad proposal, declining the quality of proofreading process results,
and... I do not think so that "it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to
be review for all page"
for that kind of "edition" it should be special level
"pseudovalidate" -
best in pink.
Z.
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l