2015-08-11 11:28 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com>:
> Then it seems that the quality level has not the same meaning on
> every wikisources. Typo such as « rn » intead of « m » are usually
> removed on the red or yellow step on fr.ws (and such obvious error
> can be seen before editing, reviewing the final render code seems enough to me).
on pl ws it should be done on "without text" -> red step

> for me all typo should be gone at the previous stage (and
> personally, I don't go from red to yellow if there is still such typo mistakes).
should be... but statistically on red-> yellow step I find 2-4 typos, on yellow-> green step - 1-2 typos (on fr ws too); if on yellow-> green step I could not found any typos, I do not change its status immediately, leave it on another day to be sure.

I'll write it again ... that is not safe to validate a page without reviewing its wikicode. A BGB at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page namespace WITHOUT displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's a bad proposal, declining the quality of proofreading process results, and... I do not think so that "it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to be review for all page"
for that kind of "edition" it should be special level "pseudovalidate" - best in pink.

Z.

_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l