On 06/28/2010 11:25 PM, Birgitte SB wrote:
Are you thinking of some bugs in paticular? I would like to see what has already been said at bugzilla if you have the numbers.
Force now to look, I'm surprised to find there really are only a few reported bugs in the ProofreadPage extension.
Some of the bugs I've long waited for to be fixed are instead in the PDF/Djvu page extraction, which is not part of ProofreadPage, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21526 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23326
I have a long time frustration with how over-complicated ProofreadPage is with its extra namespaces, new tags and dozens of parameters that each newcomer needs to learn, and it spilled over yesterday when I registered https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24168
If there are more bugs, they should be reported in Bugzilla. But what also really needs to be done is to reconsider if ProofreadPage really needs to be all this complicated. Maybe I should register that as a bug?
I wish to clarify that my first post should not be read as a personal attack on ThomasV. We all want Wikisource to improve and grow, and we're working together towards that goal.