On 06/28/2010 11:25 PM, Birgitte SB wrote:
Are you thinking of some bugs in paticular? I would
like to see what
has already been said at bugzilla if you have the numbers.
Force now to look, I'm surprised to find there really are
only a few reported bugs in the ProofreadPage extension.
Some of the bugs I've long waited for to be fixed are
instead in the PDF/Djvu page extraction, which is not
part of ProofreadPage,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21526
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23326
I have a long time frustration with how over-complicated
ProofreadPage is with its extra namespaces, new tags
and dozens of parameters that each newcomer needs to
learn, and it spilled over yesterday when I registered
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24168
If there are more bugs, they should be reported in
Bugzilla. But what also really needs to be done is to
reconsider if ProofreadPage really needs to be all this
complicated. Maybe I should register that as a bug?
I wish to clarify that my first post should not be
read as a personal attack on ThomasV. We all want
Wikisource to improve and grow, and we're working
together towards that goal.
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik -
http://aronsson.se