Também envolve uma série de questões mal resolvidas anteriormente. Aliás, acho que todo wikidrama é assim.
Eu pessoalmente deletaria da face da terra a extensão causadora da guerra de edições (ainda estou tentando descobrir a funcionalidade de algo que oculta informações para ampliar alguns centímetros das imagens que já eram ampliadas com um clique...) e esse recurso de proteção das proteções, e trancaria o Erik num quartinho sem Internet, aparelhos eletrônicos ou livros por algumas horas, mas... rs Em 11/08/2014 11:07, "Everton Zanella Alvarenga" tom@okfn.org.br escreveu:
Esse é a mais recente wiki-novela envolvendo a relação entre a comunidade e a WMF:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights
Por mais errada que possa ter sido a atitude por parte de um funcionário da WMF (não vi os detalhes), é impressionante o grau de agressividade de alguns voluntários em alguns momentos.
A WP PT já deve estar sabendo, pois fiquei sabendo via José Ribeiro num tópico da esplanada sobre o encontro do fim do mês. Mas divulgando aqui a quem interessar possa.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Mark Vandenberg jayvdb@gmail.com Date: 2014-08-10 14:29 GMT-03:00 Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikitech-l] Superprotect user right, Comming to a wiki near you To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:08 PM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 10 August 2014 15:51, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
You'd been threatening to implement super-protection for a long time. I see you finally made good on this very bad idea. This is certainly
bold,
but also incredibly reckless. Your response to being told "we don't
like
your software" is to try shove it down a wiki community's throat?
I thought this was a response to someone hamfistedly editing en:wp's JS and *actually breaking it*. When Erik reverted this change and said "don't break the damn wiki", the response was "but we can so we should be able to!" and an attempt to take the Foundation to en:wp arbitration. The obvious response is to make it so that such blithering stupidity can't be enacted again.
Super-protection was implemented in response to the German, not English, Wikipedia. It turns out that multiple communities don't like MediaViewer.
Erik is squarely responsible for the mess being made here and deserves
the
full blame and consequences. He instigated the arbitration case on the English Wikipedia and he's now instigating a war with the German
Wikipedia.
The German Wikipedia community has looked at and evaluated MediaViewer
and
has decided that it doesn't want MediaViewer enabled on its wiki. Erik
has
made it his mission to force MediaViewer on the German Wikipedians (and the Commoners), using system administrators and community advocates and anyone else he can coerce. This is unacceptable behavior on Erik's part. MediaViewer is an entirely supplementary feature, not some fundamental or critical piece of infrastructure in desperate need of protection.
As this has wide-ranging implications, I have started an RFC on meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights
-- John Vandenberg
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre http://br.okfn.org
WikimediaBR-l mailing list WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l