All,
As we approach the 25th anniversary of wiki and 20th of Wikipedia, I'm
reflecting on the various lessons that can be drawn from the way our
community has approached governance over the years. We've had a number of
conflicts; many have had significant impacts on the structure and culture
of the Wikimedia movement, perhaps even on the Internet and the world
beyond wiki. Many of them are not very well documented.
I'm especially interested to hear success stories -- conflicts that ended
in a satisfying resolution, where parties in conflict reached some shared
understanding, or worthwhile policies or practices were put in place
following a conflict.
I prefer to hear your thoughts off list, but I'll try to follow the
discussion on the list too if people prefer to post here. You also may be
interested to follow my notes on Meta Wiki:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Peteforsyth/governance
The Signpost just published an essay of mine, written for Joseph Reagle and
Jackie Koerner's upcoming book "Wikipedia at 20," that touches on this
issue. It's about the principles driving software development in the
movement, and what lessons from the early days may have gone unnoticed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-04-26/Opini…
Thanks in advance for any input on this topic.
-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]] on English Wikipedia, Wikisource, etc.