I don't believe it implies that. As with many things legal, the answer re: derivatives is likely "it depends".
R.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 10:30 PM Benjamin Ikuta benjaminikuta@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for that.
Pardon me if I've missed something, but that seems to imply, but not directly state, that AI training is a derivative work; could you clarify that?
On Jan 18, 2020, at 2:58 PM, Ryan Merkley rmerkley@wikimedia.org wrote:
[My comments are my own, and don’t reflect or suggest any official
position from WMF]
The NBC story linked below come out about a year ago. Around the same
time, when I was CEO at Creative Commons, we published a statement and updated FAQs that attempted to respond to questions being asked about permitted uses and attribution related to the licenses.
CC’s statement (March 2019) is here:
https://creativecommons.org/2019/03/13/statement-on-shared-images-in-facial-... < https://creativecommons.org/2019/03/13/statement-on-shared-images-in-facial-...
The FAQs are here:
https://creativecommons.org/faq/#artificial-intelligence-and-cc-licenses < https://creativecommons.org/faq/#artificial-intelligence-and-cc-licenses%3E
r.
Ryan Merkley (he/him) Chief of Staff, Wikimedia Foundation https://wikimediafoundation.org/
rmerkley@wikimedia.org mailto:rmerkley@wikimedia.org @ryanmerkley https://twitter.com/ryanmerkley +1 416 802 0662
On Jan 18, 2020, at 2:14 PM, John Erling Blad jeblad@gmail.com wrote:
There are several reports of face recognition going mainstream, often in less than optimum circumstances, and often violating copyright and licenses
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recog...
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/facial-recognition-s-dirty-little-secr...
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2019/01/diversity-in-faces/
In my opinion building a model for face recognition is a derived work, and as such must credit the photographers. That pose a real problem when the photographers counts in the millions and billions. Even a 1px fine print would be troublesome!
What is the official stance on this? Is it a copyright infringement or not, does the license(s) cover the case or not?
John Erling Blad /jeblad
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe