It should be, but I don't find this kind of comments particulary useful, since they doesn't seem to contribute to the overall discussion.
I believe that a central or unique code of conduct that everyone adheres to, should be the most efficient way to go, if any particulairties are needed to be put in place, those should be adressed as such, particular aditions due to a particular context.
Cheers!
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:14 PM Dennis During dcduring@gmail.com wrote:
Is Wikimedia 'friendly' to or 'safe' for people who voted for, donated to, or worked for Trump or Farage or Reagan or LePen or Berlusconi or Modi or Bolsonaro or Orban or Bush or Thatcher or Churchill?
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM camelia boban camelia.boban@gmail.com wrote:
I agree a unique, inconfondible and free of interpretations CoC to be adopted by all UGs, as suggested by Thrapostibongles.
Camelia
-- *Camelia Boban*
*| Java EE Developer |* *Affiliations Committee - **Wikimedia *Foundation Coordinator - Diversity Working Group for Wikimedia Strategy 2030 Chair & co-founder - WikiDonne User Group *| WikiDonne Project ideator*
*Diversity Space @ Wikimania 2019 Co-Lead* WMIT - WMSE - WMCH - WMAR Member
M. +39 3383385545 camelia.boban@gmail.com *Aissa Technologies* http://aissatechnologies.eu/* | *Twitter https://twitter.com/cameliaboban *|* *LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/camelia-boban-31319122* *Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Camelia.boban **| **WikiDonne UG https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiDonne* | *WikiDonne Project https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:WikiDonne *
Il giorno mar 28 mag 2019 alle ore 17:33 Mister Thrapostibongles < thrapostibongles@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Paulo
I'm curious if non discriminating anyone politically could imply a
group
or
community being forced to accept people from the extreme right or the
likes
of it, with public (but not onwiki) views against migration,
promoting
racial discrimination, and revisionism, for instance?
Surely if a participant in a project is known to be an adherent of a murderous ideology, with a history of genocide, that takes the view
that
a
certain class of person should be discriminated against, treated as inferior or subject to violence or extermination -- then any member of
the
class discriminated against would have reasonable, eve strong, grounds
for
feeling threatened by that participation?
Thrapostibongles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Dennis C. During _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe