It should be, but I don't find this kind of comments particulary useful,
since they doesn't seem to contribute to the overall discussion.
I believe that a central or unique code of conduct that everyone adheres
to, should be the most efficient way to go, if any particulairties are
needed to be put in place, those should be adressed as such, particular
aditions due to a particular context.
Cheers!
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:14 PM Dennis During <dcduring(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is Wikimedia 'friendly' to or 'safe'
for people who voted for, donated to,
or worked for Trump or Farage or Reagan or LePen or Berlusconi or Modi or
Bolsonaro or Orban or Bush or Thatcher or Churchill?
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM camelia boban <camelia.boban(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I agree a unique, inconfondible and free of
interpretations CoC to be
adopted by all UGs, as suggested by Thrapostibongles.
Camelia
--
*Camelia Boban*
*| Java EE Developer |*
*Affiliations Committee - **Wikimedia *Foundation
Coordinator - Diversity Working Group for Wikimedia Strategy 2030
Chair & co-founder - WikiDonne User Group *| WikiDonne Project ideator*
*Diversity Space @ Wikimania 2019 Co-Lead*
WMIT - WMSE - WMCH - WMAR Member
M. +39 3383385545
camelia.boban(a)gmail.com
*Aissa Technologies* <http://aissatechnologies.eu/>* | *Twitter
<https://twitter.com/cameliaboban> *|* *LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/camelia-boban-31319122>*
*Wikipedia <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Camelia.boban> **|
**WikiDonne
UG <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiDonne>* | *WikiDonne Project
<https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progetto:WikiDonne> *
Il giorno mar 28 mag 2019 alle ore 17:33 Mister Thrapostibongles <
thrapostibongles(a)gmail.com> ha scritto:
Paulo
>
> I'm curious if non discriminating anyone politically could imply a
group
> or
> > community being forced to accept people from the extreme right or the
> likes
> > of it, with public (but not onwiki) views against migration,
promoting
> > racial discrimination, and revisionism,
for instance?
> >
>
> Surely if a participant in a project is known to be an adherent of a
> murderous ideology, with a history of genocide, that takes the view
that
a
certain class of person should be discriminated
against, treated as
inferior or subject to violence or extermination -- then any member of
the
class discriminated against would have
reasonable, eve strong, grounds
for
feeling threatened by that participation?
Thrapostibongles
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Dennis C. During
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>