I too would like to know if there are any answers to this question, and while there may be more direct ways to get an answer, I agree that the answer should be shared here. Cheers, Peter Southwood
-----Original Message----- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Fæ Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 12:04 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF commitment for a Wikimedia projects archive
I am sure this Wikimedia wide community run list is a perfectly good place to check whether the WMF has any commitment to long term public archives, or not.
Thanks for your advice as to where to go, but the strategy process groups are undoubtedly a worse place to ask this question and expect a verifiable answer.
Fae
On Tue, 7 May 2019, 10:44 Dan Garry (Deskana), djgwiki@gmail.com wrote:
I think the correct venue to ask for such a large, cross-cutting, strategic commitment would be with the strategy process working groups, and not this mailing list. Did you try engaging with them?
Dan
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 09:35, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
With all of the strategy discussions still on-going, it would be good to know where the long term public archive of our Wikimedia projects sits within it.
As has been mentioned on this list previously, when volunteers donate to the Internet Archive, there is some comfort that their efforts in helping preserve public domain media will be accessible and archived for 100 years.
I have been unable to work out what the Wikimedia Foundations commitment is to maintaining a publicly accessible project archive. I may be wrong and would love to have someone post a link that puts me right, but based on past discussions, I suspect that if a project gets closed or mothballed, there is no specific commitment to fund public access to any archives. The WMF may be unable to match the 100 year commitment that the Internet Archive plans for, but it would be jolly nice to have a commitment to something and have that promoted in the long term strategy.
The best example I can think of is Wikimedia Commons as this is a significant size, so committing to maintaining a 10 or 20 year archive (not just an operational backup) is not an insignificant thing to find publicly accessible server space for or earmark a specific budget for.
Thanks, Fae -- faewik@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe