I have never said that this is a human rights violation, so please don't
put your words on my mouth.
I have said that the general principles of equality, right to fair trial,
not having ones honor damaged by baseless accusations, etc. which are
present at the UDHR are being forgotten here.
Of course you may argue that since the WMF is a private organization, they
are free to engage in this kind of secret trials, star chambers and
kangaroo courts at will. As others already stated, the matter here is not
if they can, but if they should be engaging on those schemes, as they are
now.
Best,
Paulo
A sábado, 15 de jun de 2019, 18:39, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
There is no "very basic principle of Human Rights
and dignity" to be free
from the presumption of guilt by others. You may be confusing Article 11
of the UHDR, but this applies explicitly only to "penal offenses." Unless
Fram is getting locked up in prison for his actions, let's drop the absurd
hyperbole that this is somehow a human rights violation.
Dan Rosenthal
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:35 AM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulosperneta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
People shouldn't be going with any random
option, but rather presume the
innocence of others unless guilt is proven by some legit process.
It seems that this very basic principle of Human Rights and dignity is
being forgotten.
There is not the least appearance of due process happening there, but
that
has not stopped people from finding themselves
their guilty part of
election, using their own bias to evaluate the case.
Including some Wikipedia related social network accounts that should be
acting more responsible and wiser than joining the rabble in the offwiki
harassment of their guilty part of choice.
Best,
Paulo
geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> escreveu no dia sábado, 15/06/2019 à(s) 17:15:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 00:04, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If you really think Fram's framing of events here is even plausible,
What you are calling Fram's framing appears to be a the WMF's version
of events as told to fram. The WMF does look slightly better if you
remember that T&S arw trying to improve behaviour through threat of
blocks not file a diff heavy arbcom case.
let alone the story
Given that the other versions of "the story" are T&S's PR waffle or
conspiracy theories it understandable that people are going to go with
the option that at least gives them something to work from.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>