People shouldn't be going with any random option, but rather presume the innocence of others unless guilt is proven by some legit process. It seems that this very basic principle of Human Rights and dignity is being forgotten. There is not the least appearance of due process happening there, but that has not stopped people from finding themselves their guilty part of election, using their own bias to evaluate the case. Including some Wikipedia related social network accounts that should be acting more responsible and wiser than joining the rabble in the offwiki harassment of their guilty part of choice.
Best, Paulo
geni geniice@gmail.com escreveu no dia sábado, 15/06/2019 à(s) 17:15:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 00:04, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
If you really think Fram's framing of events here is even plausible,
What you are calling Fram's framing appears to be a the WMF's version of events as told to fram. The WMF does look slightly better if you remember that T&S arw trying to improve behaviour through threat of blocks not file a diff heavy arbcom case.
let alone the story
Given that the other versions of "the story" are T&S's PR waffle or conspiracy theories it understandable that people are going to go with the option that at least gives them something to work from.
-- geni
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe