So at the moment, there is no locking of any sort. However, but it's noted
that once an article is assigned a doi, that meaning-changing edits would
be re-reviewed and an updated doi minted by from crossref's crossmark
service <https://www.crossref.org/services/crossmark/> along the lines of this
article <https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13060.1>. Copyedits and
formatting are always fine though. So far, the vast majority of editing has
occurred before the doi assignment, and articles integrated into Wikipedia
have a note in the top right to let people know that they can more
logically be edited there (example
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/RIG-I_like_receptors>
).
Thomas
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 14:18, John Erling Blad <jeblad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How do you handle lock down of articles? That is
only listed authors should
write a given article, so you can't allow random user edit access as it is
today.
Jeblad
man. 3. jun. 2019, 04.16 skrev Thomas Shafee <thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com>om>:
Yes, we put together a little checklist back in
round one (*link*
<
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Notes_on_Plan_S…
).
Initially there were a few items that are currently not achieved (e.g.
JATS-compliant XML formatting). The revised Plan_S has reduced stringency
and all the items that weren't hit happen to be optional. That being
said,
things like JATS-compliant XML and citation
metadata would be valuable to
implement anyway for machine readability.
Thomas
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 04:53, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It already is Plan-S compliant :-)
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S#Licensing_and_rights
>
> Plan-S unfortunately is looking at allowing ND content.
>
> James
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:14 AM Mister Thrapostibongles <
> thrapostibongles(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thomas
> >
> > Is it intended that the journals should be Plan-S compliant?
> >
> > Thrapostibongles
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:01 AM Thomas Shafee <
thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com>
>
wrote:
>
> > Hello Wikipedians,
> >
> > Over the last few years, the WikiJournal User Group
> > <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group> has been
> building
> > and testing a set of peer reviewed academic journals on a mediawiki
> > platform. The main types of articles are:
> >
> > - Existing Wikipedia articles submitted for external review and
> feedback
> > (example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006>)
> > - From-scratch articles that, after review, are imported to
Wikipedia
> (
> > example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2018.001>)
> > - Original research articles that are not imported to Wikipedia
> (example
> > <
> >
>
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Acute_gastrointesti…
> >
>
> > )
> >
> > *Proposal: WikiJournals as a new sister project
> > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal>*
> >
> > From a Wikipedian point of view, this is a complementary system to
> Featured
> > article review, but bridging the gap with external experts
> > <
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers
> >,
> > > implementing established scholarly practices
> > > <
>
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Ethics_statement
>
>,
> > and generating citable, doi-linked publications
> > <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Publishing
.
> >
> > Please take a look and support/oppose/comment!
> > All the best,
> > Thomas Shafee
> >
> > ps, We are attempting to improve awareness within the existing
wikimedia
> > community, so feel free to share with others.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: