The peer review process and the editors of the journals in question. This
is the same mechanism that prevents gibberish from getting into all peer
reviewed literature.
J
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 6:30 AM Vi to <vituzzu.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In years I've seen countless attempts to put
gibberish on our projects
which were eventually defeated by the "no original research" principle.
Even en.wikiversity struggled with a now banned user (and his
friends/enablers) pushing lots of gibberish about cold fusion, paranormal
and Wikimedia user themselves. So I ask, what will prevent this kind of
gibberish from slowing infiltrating such project?
Don't get me wrong but I think this is the first question in order to
define a "business model" for the project: why would a "serious"
research
group choose to publish there instead of already existing OA journals or
classical PR journals?
Vito
Il giorno lun 3 giu 2019 alle ore 04:16 Thomas Shafee <
thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com> ha scritto:
Yes, we put together a little checklist back in
round one (*link*
<
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Notes_on_Plan_S…
).
Initially there were a few items that are currently not achieved (e.g.
JATS-compliant XML formatting). The revised Plan_S has reduced stringency
and all the items that weren't hit happen to be optional. That being
said,
things like JATS-compliant XML and citation
metadata would be valuable to
implement anyway for machine readability.
Thomas
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 04:53, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It already is Plan-S compliant :-)
>
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S#Licensing_and_rights
>
> Plan-S unfortunately is looking at allowing ND content.
>
> James
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:14 AM Mister Thrapostibongles <
> thrapostibongles(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thomas
> >
> > Is it intended that the journals should be Plan-S compliant?
> >
> > Thrapostibongles
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:01 AM Thomas Shafee <
thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Wikipedians,
>
> Over the last few years, the WikiJournal User Group
> <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group> has been
building
> and testing a set of peer reviewed academic journals on a mediawiki
> platform. The main types of articles are:
>
> - Existing Wikipedia articles submitted for external review and
feedback
> (example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006>)
> - From-scratch articles that, after review, are imported to
Wikipedia
(
> example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2018.001>)
> - Original research articles that are not imported to Wikipedia
(example
> <
>
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Acute_gastrointesti…
> >
>
> > )
> >
> > *Proposal: WikiJournals as a new sister project
> > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal>*
> >
> > From a Wikipedian point of view, this is a complementary system to
> Featured
> > article review, but bridging the gap with external experts
> > <
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers
> >,
> > > implementing established scholarly practices
> > > <
>
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Ethics_statement
>
>,
> > and generating citable, doi-linked publications
> > <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Publishing
.
>
> Please take a look and support/oppose/comment!
> All the best,
> Thomas Shafee
>
> ps, We are attempting to improve awareness within the existing
wikimedia
> > community, so feel free to share with others.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>