Yes, we put together a little checklist back in round one (*link*
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group#Notes_on_Plan_S_compliance_criteria>
).
Initially there were a few items that are currently not achieved (e.g.
JATS-compliant XML formatting). The revised Plan_S has reduced stringency
and all the items that weren't hit happen to be optional. That being said,
things like JATS-compliant XML and citation metadata would be valuable to
implement anyway for machine readability.
Thomas
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 04:53, James Heilman <jmh649(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It already is Plan-S compliant :-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_S#Licensing_and_rights
Plan-S unfortunately is looking at allowing ND content.
James
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 8:14 AM Mister Thrapostibongles <
thrapostibongles(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thomas
Is it intended that the journals should be Plan-S compliant?
Thrapostibongles
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:01 AM Thomas Shafee <thomas.shafee(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello Wikipedians,
Over the last few years, the WikiJournal User Group
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group> has been
building
and testing a set of peer reviewed academic
journals on a mediawiki
platform. The main types of articles are:
- Existing Wikipedia articles submitted for external review and
feedback
> (example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006>)
> - From-scratch articles that, after review, are imported to
Wikipedia
(
example
<https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2018.001>)
- Original research articles that are not imported to Wikipedia
(example
<
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Acute_gastrointesti…
)
*Proposal: WikiJournals as a new sister project
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal>*
From a Wikipedian point of view, this is a complementary system to
Featured
article review, but bridging the gap with
external experts
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers
,
> implementing established scholarly practices
> <
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Ethics_statement
>,
> and generating citable, doi-linked publications
> <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Publishing>.
>
> Please take a look and support/oppose/comment!
> All the best,
> Thomas Shafee
>
> ps, We are attempting to improve awareness within the existing
wikimedia
community, so feel free to share with others.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>