Looking at the talk page briefly, I'm seeing few objections to the close and it appears that no one has reverted it, so it's likely to stick. I remain skeptical of the process (not to say that it's all bad; Matt certainly did a lot of outreach on mailing lists), but I wouldn't suggest using this as a template for good policy development methodology.
Since the plan is to move forward with this, I wish for the best. I'm not a fan of anarchy and there have been a few incidents in technical spaces in which I felt there were conduct problems. Hopefully this policy will be a net benefit.
Pine