Why should that feature in the WMF's annual report, though?
I also agree that this has been over-politicised, whether intentionally or not. :-(
Thanks, Mike
On 1 Mar 2017, at 21:13, Dan Rosenthal swatjester@gmail.com wrote:
Florence -- Trump's executive orders also involved the revocation of non-immigrant visas. I don't think the choice of picture is inappropriate at all. In fact, I think it highlights just how poorly planned and executed the executive order was in the first place.
Whether the sitenotice is a good idea in the first place, separate question.
Dan Rosenthal
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
It's an unambiguously political statement. Not political in the sense of "everything we do is political" - but in the sense of opposing the policies of a single national government as promulgated by a head of state and supported by one political party in a deeply polarized and contentious political environment. I expect that any WMF official responsible for this report will acknowledge this is true, as there appears to be no way to honestly claim otherwise. In that case I hope they can provide a well reasoned and passionate defense of this decision and why the WMF should continue in this vein. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe