I don't feel personnally that this post is not courteous. I see it as a proposition and a question echoing world wide concern on the matter (I am based in Switzerland), although I do understand that a answer from the WMF is delicate.
Kind regards,
Natacha
Le 31 janv. 2017 à 00:51, Nathan a écrit :
It might be more effective, and certainly more courteous, if you could avoid making essentially the same set of advocacy posts almost every day.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
I propose that the Foundation issue a statement in support of striking Google employees:
http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/30/14446312/google- immigration-protest-walkout-trump-googlers-unite
And endorsing the call for a national general strike:
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/5r3wxp/ forget_protest_trumps_actions_warrant_a_general/
(Except for the Lyft part, because one of its founders is on the adminstration's transition team.)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:38 PM James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
Is this more appropriate for the Public Policy or Wikimedia-l list?
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/ jurisprudence/2017/01/court_rulings_couldn_t_protect_ everyone_detained_because_of_trump_s_immigration.html
Several permanent residents have apparently been tricked into signing
away their green cards while being detained without benefit of
counsel.
How many Foundation employees are affected by the travel ban?
Will the foundation join the calls for a general strike?
Publicpolicy mailing list Publicpolicy@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe