Hi all, The Interactive Team in Discovery is in the process of putting its work on pause. The team's aim during this period is to get its work to a stable and maintainable state. Currently, work on new features is on hold. It is not yet known what the timeline is for this transition to a paused state, or whether there will be further deployments of features that have already been completed. I will update this list when there is more information. Thanks, Dan -- Dan Garry Lead Product Manager, Discovery Wikimedia Foundation
So it seems all work on Maps, Graphs and other interactive features is going to be halted pretty soon. I was directed at this notification after a Maps ticket mentioned:
With the team winding down
To which I asked:
Why is the team winding down ?
To which Dan Garry responded:
There were expectations that were set regarding things such as team goals, working collaboratively with stakeholders, and advance notice to communities, that were repeatedly not met by the team.
And he pointed me to this discovery mailing list announcement, which well isn't really an explanation as much as a statement on the effect that 'winding down' will have.
My interpretation of the information up to here was: "we are dissolving this team because it didn't perform and by posting to discovery mailing list we did the minimal effort required to notify people, but lets hope nobody notices what the notification really means" At the same time Dan's words are a rather hefty review on the performance of a team, which I'm not used to seeing from WMF. Refreshing, but unusual.
This annoys me and I answer:
1: I'd expect this to be announced on wikimedia-l, if we start a team we always seem more than anxious to do so. 2: I'd like some details. I thought we had left behind all the "let's try and hide this and hope no one notices it"-shit in 2016. 3: Thank you team ! You did some great work, and it was more productive and groundbreaking than many other teams have been able to do in 5 years.
A bit hyperbolic on all fronts, I admit.
To which Dan responds with:
I am not the person who made this decision. I do not know all of the reasons it was made. The person who made the decision is on vacation for the next few weeks. I am trying my best to communicate as much as I can in her absence, which is why I made a public announcement of all that I know now rather than waiting weeks for my manager to return. I am afraid that some patience is required until Katie gets back from vacation.
So now Dan doesn't know enough to be able to discuss this, even though he gave a rather destructive team review earlier.
1: This is exactly the kind of communication that 'the community' keeps complaining about. Reactive instead of proactive. Evasive instead of transparent. Now volunteers need to spend time to figure out what is happening here ? This has cost me over 3 hours today. I would have liked to have spent that time differently. 2: It shouldn't matter that Katie is on holidays, I'd assume/hope someone takes over her duties while she is away (Likely Dan himself and/or Wes Moran). Providing information on topics like this shouldn't have to wait until someone returns from a (likely well deserved) holiday. 3: Why do I have to write this email ? It's really not that hard: Make a decision, explain it.
DJ