Keegan, that may very well be true (though I would say it's certain
communication channels, not "our entire movement.")
But stating that has no logical relation whatsoever to whether or not a
certain trustee should remain in their position.
Also: If there are eight people who repeat something ad nauseum, doesn't it
stand to reason that there might be more than eight who feel the same way,
but don't see the benefit in repeating it ad nauseum? Doesn't it stand to
reason that there might be more than eight who *cannot* publicly state
their view, without risking (in reality or in their imagination)
substantial backlash due to their roles?
-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Keegan Peterzell <keegan.wiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Michel Vuijlsteke
<wikipedia(a)zog.org>
wrote:
I would venture quite a bit more than 'eight
people' are annoyed by the
constant and blatant double standard.
And oh, I now anticipate a patronizing mail that starts with 'Hoi,' and
ends with 'Thanks' -- it's not just 'the same eight people' that
keep
repeating their position ad nauseam.
Our general movement mailing list is a cesspool of personal vendettas,
fear, uncertainty, and doubt, and people taking advantage of that in the
guise of caring about the movement. It's quite embarrassing.
I now anticipate the {{cn}} response, so here it is:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/
--
~Keegan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address
is in a personal capacity.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>