Gerard not sure what you mean? In the Wikipedia world if a RfC is either poorly formed or poorly participated in than it is not uncommon for another one to occur.
J
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi, When it is only a nominal consideration but mostly a chuckle, what does it say about the validity of those people and their assumptions? This is exactly the infuriating kind of response that turns people off the community. Thanks, GerardM
On 12 March 2016 at 14:45, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 2016-03-12 6:31 AM, Anthony Cole wrote:
I've lost track of where that's at.
Well, there was a consultation involving too few people that had a slight majority picking every other year out of a set of constrained options; followed by quite a bit of protestation; followed by the chair of the selection committee responding that the consultation will be given "all
due
consideration".
I've very little doubt - knowing the selection committee people and their involvement in Wikimania since Frankfurt - that the so-called
consultation
/will/ be given all the consideration that it is due: very little, and a bit of chuckle.
:-)
-- Coren / Marc
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe