Yes, that would be original research and not permitted on the English
Wikipedia.
Joe
On Tuesday, 8 March 2016, Shlomi Fish <shlomif(a)shlomifish.org> wrote:
Dear Ruslan,
please reply to my questions below. I've been waiting all along.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:55:04 +0200
Shlomi Fish <shlomif(a)shlomifish.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
sorry for the late reply.
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:01:31 +0300
Ruslan <ruslik00(a)gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> Answering your questions:
>
> 1. Yes, this conference proceedings paper is sufficiently reliable
to be
included into a wikipedia article. (Notability of the paper does not
matter.) The full reference is
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2001576.2001836
2. No, discussion threads are not reliable sources and can not be
included.
I see. Well, my dilemma here is that if I wrote that the best performing
known solver todate could only solve 98% of the first 32,000 layouts,
that
will be very misleading (because like I said
hobbyist solvers exist that
can
solve 31,999 of the deals and I was also able to
verify these solutions
as
legal ones using a verification code). So what
can we do? If I (or
someone
else) prepare a small public research document,
which won't be an
academic
paper but will still have reproducible results,
and publish it somewhere
(with sources on GitHub, but also a version available on a static HTML
site)
and then cite that
- will this be good enough? Or will this violate Wikipedia's
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research policy?
Thanks in advance,
-- Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish
http://www.shlomifish.org/
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/Emma-Watson/
Chuck Norris does not code; when he sits at a computer, it just does
whatever
he wants. (By: Kattana.)
—
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/Chuck-Norris/
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post -
http://shlom.in/reply .
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
?subject=unsubscribe>